The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Baseball (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/)
-   -   Day 2... (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/53383-day-2-a.html)

mbyron Wed May 27, 2009 03:00pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Welpe (Post 604914)
I think I agree as I found the following from J/R after a little more digging.

"A fielder cannot be privileged if he is chasing a batted ball that has been deflected or missed. If, however, he is trying to field a ball that has been deflected by another fielder, he can be privileged."

Yep. That's it. :cool:

jdmara Wed May 27, 2009 04:20pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Welpe (Post 604914)
I think I agree as I found the following from J/R after a little more digging.

"A fielder cannot be privileged if he is chasing a batted ball that has been deflected or missed. If, however, he is trying to field a ball that has been deflected by another fielder, he can be privileged."

If it deflects off a base or rubber, the fielder is privileged as well?

-Josh

bob jenkins Thu May 28, 2009 06:59am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Welpe (Post 604906)
Can a fielder reacquire protection if he is in the act of fielding his own previously deflected ball? The play I'm thinking of is the NCAA play from last year where the pitcher deflected it off his foot, chased it and was in the act of fielding it when the BR ran into him near the first baseline.


After much kerfluffle, the NCAA ruling is that if a *DIFFERENT* fielder is chasing after the ball and is in the act of fielding it, then that second fielder is protected. The first fielder cannot re-gain protection.

When Drake's board was active, many (most? all?) of the active MiLB umpires said that they would allow the original fielder to "regain" protection. I'm not sure I buy that.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:46pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1