The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 18, 2009, 05:25pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 83
AH HA!! "They've been right all along!"

Indisputable PROOF! You "know-it-all" umpires are proven WRONG! HA HA HA!

Yes, the HANDS

ARE

Part of the BAT! (for they couldn't say it if it were not true!)

Mariners | Notebook | Bunt attempt ends badly for Rob Johnson | Seattle Times Newspaper


The relevant text:

He ran slowly toward first, wondering if it might be called a foul ball. It wasn't because a hand on the bat is considered part of the bat.
__________________
LLJVU in Seattle
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue May 19, 2009, 07:54am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 2,439
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikebran View Post
Indisputable PROOF! You "know-it-all" umpires are proven WRONG! HA HA HA!

Yes, the HANDS

ARE

Part of the BAT! (for they couldn't say it if it were not true!)

Mariners | Notebook | Bunt attempt ends badly for Rob Johnson | Seattle Times Newspaper


The relevant text:

He ran slowly toward first, wondering if it might be called a foul ball. It wasn't because a hand on the bat is considered part of the bat.
You are absolutley, indisputably correct! And the pitch was a rising fastball, too!
__________________
When in doubt, bang 'em out!
Ozzy
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue May 19, 2009, 08:35am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: W. Pa
Posts: 216
of course

if its printed in a newspaper its got to be correct......right????
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue May 19, 2009, 09:22am
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Maybe if we leave enough comments, the reporter will learn something. Or not.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue May 19, 2009, 11:16am
Archaic Power Monger
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,983
Quote:
Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve View Post
Maybe if we leave enough comments, the reporter will learn something. Or not.
Sadly, I think it would be "affimation" in the reporter's mind that umpires are an incompetent lot.
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Tue May 19, 2009, 01:09pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,118
I did get an MLB.com reporter to change a story last year...he had Interference and Obstruction confused and he ACTUALLY thanked me for correcting him.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Tue May 19, 2009, 01:20pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,895
I once edited a story on Carlos Delgado's four-homer game, in which the reporter (from a major baseball site) wrote the following passage: "It was the first four-homer game of Delgado's career." At that time, Delgado became the 13th player since the dawn of the modern era in 1900 to accomplish the feat. But the reporter actually felt the need to make it known that of the paltry dozen such occurrences in a 104-year period, not one was credited to Delgado.

It might have been the most memorable idiotic reference I have read. And it was from a major league baseball reporter writing for an elite entity.

The standard for the competence of a major league reporter has never been lower. There are 20 and 30-year veteran writers--real writers--who don't even speak to idiots like the young reporter of this Seattle story.

Last edited by Kevin Finnerty; Tue May 19, 2009 at 01:24pm.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Tue May 19, 2009, 02:58pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 15
I'm confused. Did the umpire get this wrong? If the pitch hit his hand, it should have been a dead ball. If the pitch hit the bat and then his hand, it should be a foul ball. Am I missing something?
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Tue May 19, 2009, 06:20pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: The 503
Posts: 785
Quote:
Originally Posted by bfoster View Post
I'm confused. Did the umpire get this wrong? If the pitch hit his hand, it should have been a dead ball. If the pitch hit the bat and then his hand, it should be a foul ball. Am I missing something?
If, as the article states, the pitch hit his hand while he was attempting to hit the ball, the ball is dead and a strike is charged to the batter. If that was the third strike he would be out. It is not a foul ball.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 20, 2009, 09:36am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 15
Right. There's no way the umpire got this call right. It was either a dead ball, strike or not. Or it was a foul ball.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 20, 2009, 11:13am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 281
Send a message via AIM to charliej47 Send a message via MSN to charliej47 Send a message via Yahoo to charliej47
Cool

This goes to show that even the PROs get it wrong once in a while. I was at a PRO game and watched the UMPs screw up twice in the 50 years that I have been going.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 20, 2009, 01:17pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1
Here's the video of the play:
http://mlb.mlb.com/media/video.jsp?content_id=4612213

But what's worse? That one reporter and one broadcaster didn't know the rule, or that four umpires couldn't figure out that the ball hit the batter's hand?
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 20, 2009, 03:12pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: The 503
Posts: 785
Quote:
Originally Posted by kerplunk View Post
Here's the video of the play:
Baseball Video Highlights & Clips | BOS@SEA: The Red Sox catch Balentien off second base - Video | MLB.com: Multimedia

But what's worse? That one reporter and one broadcaster didn't know the rule, or that four umpires couldn't figure out that the ball hit the batter's hand?
One umpire. I think it's doubtful the other three would or could have anything to give the PU in this case. And it's not like this is really easy for the PU to see.

So he missed it. It happens. Big deal.

As an Ms fan I can tell you a missed call will not be the reason they will be fighting to stay out of the cellar this year yet again.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ABC's "Nightline" examines "worst calls ever" tonight pizanno Basketball 27 Fri Jul 04, 2008 06:08am
Finding a "good" video/DVD on 2 man mechanics" Linknblue Basketball 3 Mon Dec 10, 2007 09:55am
Can "FOUL" be made "FAIR"? PAT THE REF Baseball 60 Sat Feb 24, 2007 09:01pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:23am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1