![]() |
Rather than a moderator, we need a babysitter who calls it both ways.
|
Quote:
I apologize to the 10% who had valid posts deleted. |
Quote:
|
"Valid posts."
Valid to whom? |
Standard More Popular
Quote:
However, some of this may be due to the fact that we are one of the only ones who has this mask in that frame shape. Jim Kirk Owner www.ump-attire.com |
I bought the Wilson Titanium in the first week, and I got the low-profile, because that's all they came in at the beginning. I was disappointed when I saw that they were offering it in the standard profile soon after, and even considered asking Wilson to swap my cage for a standard cage.
Then I took a full-on 88-mph shot between the eyes, and it really was not nearly as severe as a similar shot to the chrome-moliben low-profile or standard profile (my other two masks). With that experience, I stuck with the low-profile in the titanium and it has been remarkable. The light-colored bars are easier to see through, and the low profile makes it easier to see the bottom part of the strike zone, allowing me to set up a little higher. It's a superb view. Its reputation for taking blows that stick is well-founded, I suppose; but the thing's so light that it doesn't shake you up like a standard low profile. It's worth the trade off--so far. |
Quote:
|
How about all the posts lambasting the OP for his punctuation? Delete those as well.
|
Quote:
|
Is there any masks that any of you used, and had trouble with? Seems as though most newer styles are well built.
I guess another question is, ...what makes an expensive mask better, besides the weight? |
Two +POS masks come to mind.
"Q: Is there any masks that any of you used, and had trouble with? Seems as though most newer styles are well built."
The SUL carbon/plastic frame is a no-no. I have seen a cracked one and heard and read of many stories of injuries due to this mask. There is a thread on that very problem and how it was a big factor in the demise of +POS as a company/supplier by Don Parsons of +POS ownership/family here on another forum back in December. Another +POS mask made of coated aluminum/metal with hollow tubing. Also called a Super Ultra-light with a number (I think SUL300). I had a partner with a big dent in that model mask over his right eye area. I asked him why he was still wearing the mask? His reply: "I paid $80 for it. I'm going to wear it until it doesn't protect me anymore." I certainly hope he does not find out the hard way. Since +POS is now out of business you don't have to worry too much. I would not buy a used +POS mask of any model though. I don't know of any of the newer model Wilson's like dyna-lite, Chrome Moliben/New-view denting. Of course, Titanium is your best be so far for lightweight and strength combination. The Schutt/Diamond that is now selling in silver and black rubber coating have weld spots where the horizontal and vertical bars meet and are made of what appears to be a light aircraft grade cast aluminum. I have seen a black one with the rubber coating cracking off but have heard of no problems with these masks. Hope this helps. |
I'm pretty sure my Schutt is hollow tube steel. +POS had the aluminium mask, but the tubes were a bit thick.
So far, so good with the Schutt. I've got standar size WV Amara pads in it, as the original pads are junk, and I got clocked pretty good on the chin. It's a bit lower profile than my Honigs and Dynalite, but not as flat as the New View. I like this current rig a lot. |
I looked your mask up. I see it has the bar at the top, like the Diamond mask.
I'm thinking of getting one with that bar. I have had the top of my head skimmed (only twice in 17 years) it smarts a little. I like the diamond in the silver/grey, since some posters say the light color seems easier to see thru. |
Any blow that glances doesn't really hurt, including the dome scrapers. No need for extra bar.
|
Yea, your probably right. It smarted for a couple minutes, but never left a bump or anything.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:18pm. |