The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Baseball (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/)
-   -   MLB's The Baseball Network (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/50658-mlbs-baseball-network.html)

UMP25 Fri Jan 02, 2009 05:27pm

MLB's The Baseball Network
 
It premiered Yesterday, January 1, 2009. DirecTV has a major stake in this new network, which is probably why it's in the basic package and not some higher level one. It's also the reason why MLB doesn't charge carriage fees to DirecTV for covering it. It's available on channel 213 HD for those who are interested.

Some cable companies are also carrying it, as this was part of the MLB Extra Innings deal that DirecTV struck with MLB and this new network, so check your local cable listings. I don't know in which package the MLB Network will be on cable, so consult your local company for more info.

The network's a fledgling right now, but based on what I've read on another forum I visit, it looks to be a great venture. For those who saw--or didn't see--Ken Burns's highly acclaimed series Baseball, The Baseball Network will show it beginning next Tuesday, January 6th, at 8:00 p.m. EST. The fact that it will be in HD ought to be nice.

Bob Costas will have a lot of presence on this network, which is fine with me. I'd take him over McCarver and Morgan any day. Let's just hope those latter two don't pop up much on this new network.

Kevin Finnerty Fri Jan 02, 2009 06:36pm

Ken Burns' BASEBALL was only highly acclaimed in filmmaking circles. In baseball circles, it was rather widely ridiculed. It was fascinating to watch some of the films that they unearthed and a few of the interviews were interesting, but it was way too narrow and self-indulgent to be considered a true filmed history of baseball. When you see it again, you'll get an idea of what I'm describing.

Kevin Finnerty Fri Jan 02, 2009 07:03pm

I'm going bananas over this network, however.

Some of the stuff they've already had has been magnificent. Larsen's perfect game was enchanting stuff.

JRutledge Fri Jan 02, 2009 07:25pm

You mean there is one more channel I can avoid? Thanks for the heads up. :D

Peace

Kevin Finnerty Fri Jan 02, 2009 07:48pm

You don't like baseball?

UMP25 Fri Jan 02, 2009 11:55pm

It has never really been a priority for him.

UMP25 Fri Jan 02, 2009 11:56pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevin Finnerty (Post 563756)
Ken Burns' BASEBALL was only highly acclaimed in filmmaking circles. In baseball circles, it was rather widely ridiculed. It was fascinating to watch some of the films that they unearthed and a few of the interviews were interesting, but it was way too narrow and self-indulgent to be considered a true filmed history of baseball. When you see it again, you'll get an idea of what I'm describing.

So? You're attempting to be nit-picky. I've seen the series and liked it very much. I'm looking forward to seeing it in HD.

JRutledge Sat Jan 03, 2009 12:40am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevin Finnerty (Post 563769)
You don't like baseball?

No, I like baseball. I just am not one who watches 24 hour channels for a league. ESPN covers enough baseball; I do not see the need for another 24 Hour network. BTW, I am a little tired of always hearing about how players from 50 years ago were so much better than players of today. Just another reason to avoid the channel all together if you ask me and guys like Bob Costas gets on my nerves when it comes to baseball history.

Peace

UMP25 Sat Jan 03, 2009 12:42am

No one says you have to watch such a channel all the time, JR. These channels are unique when compared to ESPN, a channel I like, because they cover certain aspects of the game in a manner ESPN can't or won't. That is one of the allures of such a channel.

JRutledge Sat Jan 03, 2009 12:48am

Quote:

Originally Posted by UMP25 (Post 563830)
No one says you have to watch such a channel all the time, JR. These channels are unique when compared to ESPN, a channel I like, because they cover certain aspects of the game in a manner ESPN can't or won't. That is one of the allures of such a channel.

Of course you did not say that. I am the one saying that. ;)

I am a basketball fan, but I do not want the NBA Network either.

UMP25 Sat Jan 03, 2009 12:56am

"Want" or "watch"? The former seems rather harsh.

JRutledge Sat Jan 03, 2009 01:05am

Want!!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by UMP25 (Post 563833)
"Want" or "watch"? The former seems rather harsh.

As far as I know, I do not get the MLB Network as of this moment. I will not be making a phone call to my cable company anytime soon complaining. They could get rid of the NBA and NHL Networks and I would not be the least bit upset.

UMP25 Sat Jan 03, 2009 01:08am

I think your opinion is well known now.

SanDiegoSteve Sat Jan 03, 2009 02:22am

Quote:

Originally Posted by UMP25 (Post 563837)
I think your opinion is well known now.

And widely rejected as well. It's a minority position, though...surprise!:)

bob jenkins Sat Jan 03, 2009 08:33am

Quote:

Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve (Post 563847)
And widely rejected as well. It's a minority position, though...surprise!:)

Of course it's a minority opinion -- Jeff is a minority.

For the record, I don't get (I assume -- I haven't checked my cable provider), nor will I complain about not getting, the MLB (or any other sport-specific) network.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:48pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1