The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Baseball (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/)
-   -   The Smitty Chronicles (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/45373-smitty-chronicles.html)

aceholleran Wed Jun 11, 2008 07:18pm

The Smitty Chronicles
 
Loved Tuss' Smitty thread. It made me think of incompetent or over-the-hill officials I have known.

The ones who pi$$ me off most are the shopworn vets who love to dispense advice.

There was a guy in my area who was the best ump around--all you had to do was ask him. He came to spectate at a HS game I was doing and chastised me between innings for wearing a watch. I didn't take it off. After the game he asked me how I dare defy him. I calmly said, "Well, sport, if I take your advice and really follow it, I'll end up being just as mediocre as you are."

I knew a similar guy who did hoops. I was on his board. Once I watched him do a key state game where he totally botched a player DQ. At the next meeting, the same ref went into a longish screed about fouling-out procedure, citing his own botched work (but not referring to himself). I knew I was leaving the board soon, so I stood up and asked, "Hey Frank--who worked that game?" He sat down, speechless, and the room cracked up.

I worked on that same board with a sharp, young ref who couldn't BUY a varsity game. So he quit, went to a camp and was doing D-2 college a couple of years later. I watched him do a game in my area and one of the board honchos came up to me and said, "Hey Ace, isn't that Harry Refname out there?" After I assented, he said, "But he's a jayvee official!"

I said, "Not anymore."



Ace

BigUmp56 Wed Jun 11, 2008 07:56pm

I'm curious as to why you'd feel the need to wear a watch during a game. They guy could have been a total douche bag for the most part, but he was right on this point.


Tim.

Tom H. Wed Jun 11, 2008 08:52pm


Well the official that you speak of may have been incompetent or over-the-hill, but he was right about taking off the watch.
I would also add that IMHO your attitude and response was rude, crass and uncalled for.
You know, someday YOU will be considered the "incompetent or over-the-hill" guy by some "newbe".
Very distastefull to me.

BigUmp56 Wed Jun 11, 2008 08:57pm

In Ace's defense, Tom, I have to say his response wasn't all that uncalled for given what the guy said to him.


Quote:

Originally Posted by aceholleran
After the game he asked me how I dare defy him.

Ace


That's an invite for a terse response.


Tim.

canadaump6 Fri Jun 13, 2008 01:12am

I do not think it is fair for us to refer to poor umpires as "smitty", because it reflects negatively on coaches and implies that most coaches are not up to the task.

CO ump Fri Jun 13, 2008 01:17am

Quote:

Originally Posted by aceholleran

I knew a similar guy who did hoops. I was on his board. Once I watched him do a key state game where he totally botched a player DQ. At the next meeting, the same ref went into a longish screed about fouling-out procedure, citing his own botched work (but not referring to himself). I knew I was leaving the board soon, so I stood up and asked, "Hey Frank--who worked that game?" He sat down, speechless, and the room cracked up.


Ace

So a guy makes a mistake, owns up to it and you feel the need to embarass him. And then only because you were leaving the board
In my neck of the woods we call that "coward"

bob jenkins Fri Jun 13, 2008 08:00am

Quote:

Originally Posted by canadaump6
I do not think it is fair for us to refer to poor umpires as "smitty", because it reflects negatively on coaches and implies that most coaches are not up to the task.

Please explain. Maybe it's a language thing between Canadian English and idioms and American English and idioms.

LMan Fri Jun 13, 2008 08:06am

Quote:

Originally Posted by canadaump6
I do not think it is fair for us to refer to poor umpires as "smitty", because it reflects negatively on coaches and implies that most coaches are not up to the task.


ahhh heck its Friday, I'll play


How does the word 'Smitty' refer to coaches? Too much Labatt's last night, eh, cd? ;)

TussAgee11 Fri Jun 13, 2008 09:10am

Quote:

Originally Posted by CO ump
So a guy makes a mistake, owns up to it and you feel the need to embarass him. And then only because you were leaving the board
In my neck of the woods we call that "coward"

The guy was not owning up to his mistake. He was telling everybody how to deal with DQs and cited his own game mess up without saying it was his game and he botched it.

If an official can't deal with being a bit thrown off in an association meeting, how in the heck is he going to listen to a coach in his ear for 4 quarters?

TussAgee11 Fri Jun 13, 2008 09:12am

Quote:

Originally Posted by canadaump6
I do not think it is fair for us to refer to poor umpires as "smitty", because it reflects negatively on coaches and implies that most coaches are not up to the task.

I have no idea what you're saying, but I'll try to respond.

You can be a poor umpire and not a smitty. Its really not hard, take advice, wear a proper uniform, and have an inquiry as the rules of the game and the mechanics.

You could miss every call in a given game and not be a smitty. Just a bad umpire.

ozzy6900 Fri Jun 13, 2008 10:55am

Quote:

Originally Posted by canadaump6
I do not think it is fair for us to refer to poor umpires as "smitty", because it reflects negatively on coaches and implies that most coaches are not up to the task.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TussAgee11
I have no idea what you're saying, but I'll try to respond.

You can be a poor umpire and not a smitty. Its really not hard, take advice, wear a proper uniform, and have an inquiry as the rules of the game and the mechanics.

You could miss every call in a given game and not be a smitty. Just a bad umpire.

CD, here in the US, a Smitty will wear his hat backwards at the plate, wear his shin guards on the outside of his pants, and have a ball bag full of seeds. On the bases, he will brush off the pitcher's plate, brush off the bases, and flash the count back to the PU. As Tuss stated, it is not the bad umpire that is the Smitty. And Smitty has no references to coaches, it is strictly pointed to umpires.

danreeves1973 Fri Jun 13, 2008 11:15am

Quote:

Originally Posted by ozzy6900
CD, here in the US, a Smitty will wear his hat backwards at the plate, wear his shin guards on the outside of his pants, and have a ball bag full of seeds. On the bases, he will brush off the pitcher's plate, brush off the bases, and flash the count back to the PU. As Tuss stated, it is not the bad umpire that is the Smitty. And Smitty has no references to coaches, it is strictly pointed to umpires.

They'll also come to games and offer "sage wisdom" to you through the backstop between innings, such gems as "Did you know the tie really doesn't go to the runner?"

I smiled, nodded and reminded him the bat also had no hands and that you could overrun first base and turn towards second. He got confused on that last one. :D

mick Fri Jun 13, 2008 11:18am

[quote=TussAgee11]The guy was not owning up to his mistake. He was telling everybody how to deal with DQs and cited his own game mess up without saying it was his game and he botched it.

If an official can't deal with being a bit thrown off in an association meeting, how in the heck is he going to listen to a coach in his ear for 4 quarters?[/quote]

Tuss,
There something to be said for that.

But, I hafta judge intent. If the intent is to flame and humiliate, then making such statements is rude, impolite, disrespectful and ill-mannered.

Adam Fri Jun 13, 2008 11:56am

Why do I doubt that "smitty" used the word "defy" in his query?

canadaump6 Fri Jun 13, 2008 01:23pm

I always thought a "Smitty" referred to a coach, and that umpires used it as a synonym for "rats". Now it seems it is a term used solely to describe umpires with a bad attitude.

zebra2955 Fri Jun 13, 2008 01:52pm

How did that name originate? "smitty "

mick Fri Jun 13, 2008 02:10pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by canadaump6
I always thought a "Smitty" referred to a coach, and that umpires used it as a synonym for "rats". Now it seems it is a term used solely to describe umpires with a bad attitude.

Oops !!! Ya got that rear-end to. :)
I don't think attitude comes into play for them, unless they just don't care about their appearance on the field.

mick Fri Jun 13, 2008 02:18pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by zebra2955
How did that name originate? "smitty "

Guessing here, that one of the members was telling/relating a story about an umpire, without giving the actual name.
Smith, being a rather common name, was selected and to carry it a bit further, and to make that umpire more familiar, because he may be in Anyville, USA , "Smitty" evolved. :)

UmpJM Fri Jun 13, 2008 02:25pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by zebra2955
How did that name originate? "smitty "

zebra2955,

I believe the term was originally coined by Carl Childress in an article he wrote for Referee magazine prior to the inception of Officiating.com. I believe Mick's hypothesis pretty well summarizes Carl's intent.

JM

SanDiegoSteve Fri Jun 13, 2008 04:12pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by canadaump6
I always thought a "Smitty" referred to a coach, and that umpires used it as a synonym for "rats". Now it seems it is a term used solely to describe umpires with a bad attitude.

Not bad attitudes necessarily, but many bad habits which they believe to be the proper way of doing something and refuse to listen to anyone who tries to correct them. Ozzy gave a good partial list of things that identify "Smitty."

zebra2955 Sat Jun 14, 2008 06:16am

Thanks for the info

ODJ Sat Jun 14, 2008 11:56am

Quote:

Originally Posted by ozzy6900
CD, here in the US, a Smitty will wear his hat backwards at the plate, wear his shin guards on the outside of his pants, and have a ball bag full of seeds. On the bases, he will brush off the pitcher's plate, brush off the bases, and flash the count back to the PU. As Tuss stated, it is not the bad umpire that is the Smitty. And Smitty has no references to coaches, it is strictly pointed to umpires.

I would differentiate between 1) a Smitty: One who thinks he knows all, but doesn't; One who tells all how to do it, but can't; One who thinks he's the great gift to officiating, but isn't; Is oblivious to his foolishness.

And 2) umpires, as Ozzy describes, who are just clueless. An official can plain ol' stink and be lousy, but it's when he starts spouting off, the Smitty label is attached.

I'll add:
-Upon meeting you for the first time, he recites his resume and "experience." Take a deep breath and enjoy the day's ride through Hell.:rolleyes:
-States he has a HUGE zone, only to be size of a tea cup.

My first game ever w/partner: 11-y.o. game. Partner gets out of his car, straps on his shin guards outside the pants. I walk over to say I'm here and already dressed for the plate. He then takes off his guards and proceeds to put them back on, under his pants.

ILRef80 Sat Jun 14, 2008 08:38pm

I worked a summer league game (17-18 year old kids) today with a guy who didn't have a ball bag, wore a brown belt and even work khakis :eek:

zebra2955 Sun Jun 15, 2008 06:34am

Quote:

Originally Posted by ILRef80
I worked a summer league game (17-18 year old kids) today with a guy who didn't have a ball bag, wore a brown belt and even work khakis :eek:


I think I know that guy!!
Did he also wear a fishing hat?

aceholleran Mon Jun 16, 2008 07:09am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom H.

Well the official that you speak of may have been incompetent or over-the-hill, but he was right about taking off the watch.
I would also add that IMHO your attitude and response was rude, crass and uncalled for.
You know, someday YOU will be considered the "incompetent or over-the-hill" guy by some "newbe".
Very distastefull to me.

I KNEW some of youse would jump all over me for wearing a watch. Why can't you cull through this to the actual point of the post?

Thois is my problem with the board--too many of you try to rip a post apart without getting to its crux.

When do YOU go to a game you are not working, and, during the game, walk up to an official and give him grief--for anything--much less something as minor as wearing a watch. BTW, he was not my assignor, an officer on the board... nuttin'.

Jeeze, Louise.

Ace

aceholleran Mon Jun 16, 2008 07:13am

Quote:

Originally Posted by CO ump
So a guy makes a mistake, owns up to it and you feel the need to embarass him. And then only because you were leaving the board
In my neck of the woods we call that "coward"

In my neck of the woods, we don't throw names like that around.

If anyone was a pantywaist, it was the veteran ref who couldn't own up to his own mistake, yet decided to subject his audience to a long diatribe, when he, in fact, was the erring ref. He deserved every bit of my treatment. That was the point of my post.

I'm done with you, CO. I can't brook such babbling.

Ace

celebur Mon Jun 16, 2008 10:08am

Quote:

Originally Posted by aceholleran
I KNEW some of youse would jump all over me for wearing a watch.

So...would you like "youse" to be pronounced like "ewes". Or would you prefer that it rhyme with "louse"? :rolleyes:

Rita C Mon Jun 16, 2008 10:41am

Quote:

Originally Posted by aceholleran

If anyone was a pantywaist, it was the veteran ref who couldn't own up to his own mistake, yet decided to subject his audience to a long diatribe, when he, in fact, was the erring ref. He deserved every bit of my treatment.

Ace

No, he didn't.

Rita

RPatrino Mon Jun 16, 2008 11:09am

Guys/Gals, when you are watching a game do you take the time to walk up and critique the officials working the game? I don't. The point is, this guy had no business even approaching Ace and saying anything, except perhaps, "Hi, how you doing Ace?"

Forest Ump Mon Jun 16, 2008 11:14am

I've met Mr. Smitty.

See: http://forum.officiating.com/showthread.php?t=32975

celebur Mon Jun 16, 2008 11:24am

Quote:

Originally Posted by RPatrino
Guys/Gals, when you are watching a game do you take the time to walk up and critique the officials working the game? I don't. The point is, this guy had no business even approaching Ace and saying anything, except perhaps, "Hi, how you doing Ace?"

I don't think anyone would disagree with that (at least, I hope no one would).

The problem is in presenting extraneous information such as the watch issue, and then throwing a hissy fit when some people (correctly) call it. For shame!

Rcichon Mon Jun 16, 2008 11:29am

Maybe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by celebur
I don't think anyone would disagree with that (at least, I hope no one would).

The problem is in presenting extraneous information such as the watch issue, and then throwing a hissy fit when some people (correctly) call it. For shame!

I would. If I never wanted to work there again or if I was picking a fight.

greymule Mon Jun 16, 2008 11:56am

Being from New Jersey, I can speak authoritatively regarding the pronunciation of youse (plural of you).

Unfortunately, the font that contains diacritical marks isn't available on this site, but it's yooz, if you imagine the o's connected like a pair of glasses and a "short vowel" sign above them. The "oo" is the sound of look or put.

An exception is that at the beginning of a clause, formal north Jersey pronunciation is identical to the English verb use, as in "Use are a buncha bums."

In both north and central Jersey, it's always the former (short vowel oo) pronunciation in the middle of a clause: "Me and him will stand youse all."

It's easy to tell when someone is affecting New Jersey speech when he uses youse in the singular. Just like y'all in the south, youse is never singular. Such a flub is sure to raise eyebrows in any bar in Hoboken.

Source: The Dictionary of New Jersey Speech and Diction, by Francis "Frankie the Pronunciator" Ferrara.

Forest Ump Mon Jun 16, 2008 01:00pm

Is it possible the two "yoots"--

Two what? What was that word?

What word?

Two what?

What?

Did you say yoots?

Yeah, two yoots.

What is a yoot?

Welpe Mon Jun 16, 2008 01:42pm

"What are you a $%^@ing world traveler now?"

Love that movie. :D

greymule Mon Jun 16, 2008 03:06pm

yoots?

youfs!

SanDiegoSteve Tue Jun 17, 2008 01:24am

Quote:

Originally Posted by greymule
yoots?

youfs!

Not in My Cousin Vinny. It's yoots!

Fred Gwynne was hilarious in that movie. It was his final role.:(

aceholleran Tue Jun 17, 2008 08:36am

Finally a little bit of back-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RPatrino
Guys/Gals, when you are watching a game do you take the time to walk up and critique the officials working the game? I don't. The point is, this guy had no business even approaching Ace and saying anything, except perhaps, "Hi, how you doing Ace?"

Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa. I am sooooo sorry that I wore a watch during a game.

I am sorry I didn't put with the sh!t of someone coming to my game and making comments.

At least RPat got through to the gist of my post.

Ace

aceholleran Tue Jun 17, 2008 08:50am

Bullchips
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by celebur
I don't think anyone would disagree with that (at least, I hope no one would).

The problem is in presenting extraneous information such as the watch issue, and then throwing a hissy fit when some people (correctly) call it. For shame!

"correctly" my a$$.

I didn't throw a hissy fit, I just zinged him back. Privately.

This guy wasn't my pard or my boss. He has no place whatsoever to come up to me and initiate any conversation about my game. Period. So, when I come back at him, I am wrong?

I repeat: Bullchips.

BTW, I had seen this guy do plenty of games, and make more than a few egregious mistakes, and had never said a word to him about his work.

Once, when I was doing a JV hoops game, one of the varsity refs for the ensuing game came into our locker room at halftime and yelled at me for a double-dribble call he didn't like.

I kicked him out the room. And wasn't nearly as nice to him as I was to the watch guy. The varsity guy complained to the board about me. And the board backed me up.

Some of you may think that as long as a spectating official is "right," that you can jump into someone else's game.

I'll never do such a thing.

Ace

RPatrino Tue Jun 17, 2008 12:28pm

Ace is 110% correct!! Not once have I ever approached an official during a game to make a unsolicited or uninvited comment or correct a mistake. It's not my place, nor is it my business to do so. I spent several years as the UIC of an umpires association and I only involved myself when something extremely serious or hazardous was occuring, and that was very RARE.

mick Tue Jun 17, 2008 12:50pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by RPatrino
Ace is 110% correct!! Not once have I ever approached an official during a game to make a unsolicited or uninvited comment or correct a mistake. It's not my place, nor is it my business to do so. I spent several years as the UIC of an umpires association and I only involved myself when something extremely serious or hazardous was occuring, and that was very RARE.

I am surprised !
With few exceptions on this forum, I envision many of our members on this forum evaluating, assisting, and advising younger/newer umpires during a game, just as if it were a quick and personal local clinic between 1/2-innings.

RPatrino Tue Jun 17, 2008 12:58pm

Of course, Mick, I have WORKED games with younger/newer umpires and have offered advice and encouragement between innings. The issue is would I do so from the 'other side of the fence', and that answer is NO. Course, you knew that ...

mick Tue Jun 17, 2008 01:03pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by RPatrino
Of course, Mick, I have WORKED games with younger/newer umpires and have offered advice and encouragement between innings. The issue is would I do so from the 'other side of the fence', and that answer is NO. Course, you knew that ...

I was wonderin' about acting more as an observer, than as a partner, with the newbees knowing that you're there, and being happy for the input.

celebur Tue Jun 17, 2008 02:21pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by aceholleran
Quote:

Originally Posted by celebur
I don't think anyone would disagree with that (at least, I hope no one would).

The problem is in presenting extraneous information such as the watch issue, and then throwing a hissy fit when some people (correctly) call it. For shame!

"correctly" my a$$.

I didn't throw a hissy fit, I just zinged him back. Privately.

This guy wasn't my pard or my boss. He has no place whatsoever to come up to me and initiate any conversation about my game. Period. So, when I come back at him, I am wrong?

Ace, I think you're misunderstanding me.

Frankly, I thought your zinger to that particular umpire was witty, and though it wouldn't be my style, I am NOT criticizing it. I couldn't help but smirk when I read it.

What I was getting at was your huffy reply when others pointed out that Smitty was right about the watch. That certainly sounded like a hissy fit to me. You claimed to know that some would pick that nit, so why did you bother citing it?


Quote:

Originally Posted by aceholleran
I repeat: Bullchips.

BTW, I had seen this guy do plenty of games, and make more than a few egregious mistakes, and had never said a word to him about his work.

Once, when I was doing a JV hoops game, one of the varsity refs for the ensuing game came into our locker room at halftime and yelled at me for a double-dribble call he didn't like.

I kicked him out the room. And wasn't nearly as nice to him as I was to the watch guy. The varsity guy complained to the board about me. And the board backed me up.

Some of you may think that as long as a spectating official is "right," that you can jump into someone else's game.

I'll never do such a thing.

Ace

And I repeat that you're misreading my post.

TussAgee11 Tue Jun 17, 2008 02:57pm

Being a younger umpire, I can tell you how flustered I got 2 years ago when an older member of the association (who was there as a site director none the less) tried to talk to me from the backstop in between innings, about me letting the kid throw his 5 prepatory pitches/ one minute in between innings. He said I had to get the game moving.

If I was where I am today in the umpiring profession, I would have replied more wittingly, but I was actually so flustered that it put me on edge for the rest of the game with my game management and attitude.

If it was my partner, it would have been fine. But a site director? Who, being an umpire, should know better!

canadaump6 Tue Jun 17, 2008 10:34pm

Tuss,

I can relate. Had a situation at CDP 2 years ago where I had just done 2nd base in a 4 man system and was excited about our scheduled rotation that would have me at 1st base for an important game.

Then along comes an older umpire, who hadn't done the previous game with us but jumps on our crew anyways and tells me "you're young- my knees are to sore to be the rabbit". So having had to put up with old guards all week, I gave in and did second base a second time. Boo.

socalblue1 Tue Jun 17, 2008 11:23pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by mick
I was wonderin' about acting more as an observer, than as a partner, with the newbees knowing that you're there, and being happy for the input.

Mick,

ONLY if assigned as an observer/evaluator. Otherwise if something bad catches your eye e-mail the assignor.

mbyron Wed Jun 18, 2008 08:27pm

Heard a great one from a coach tonight. He complained to me that TWICE in a game last week PU called "foul" on a batted ball that hit third base.

PU's rationale: "It hit the foul side of the base." Priceless!

Oh, and one of his batters ended an inning tonight with a ball down the 3rd base line. As I walked up the line, I muttered, "looked like it was headed for the foul side of the base." He laughed.

mick Wed Jun 18, 2008 08:53pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by mbyron
Heard a great one from a coach tonight. He complained to me that TWICE in a game last week PU called "foul" on a batted ball that hit third base.

PU's rationale: "It hit the foul side of the base." Priceless!

Oh, and one of his batters ended an inning tonight with a ball down the 3rd base line. As I walked up the line, I muttered, "looked like it was headed for the foul side of the base." He laughed.

Ha!:)

SanDiegoSteve Wed Jun 18, 2008 09:13pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by canadaump6
Tuss,

I can relate. Had a situation at CDP 2 years ago where I had just done 2nd base in a 4 man system and was excited about our scheduled rotation that would have me at 1st base for an important game.

Then along comes an older umpire, who hadn't done the previous game with us but jumps on our crew anyways and tells me "you're young- my knees are to sore to be the rabbit". So having had to put up with old guards all week, I gave in and did second base a second time. Boo.

First, how did this guy come up with "rabbit" for 2nd base umpire in a 4 man crew? All three base umpires have to do some running on every play just about.

Second, the guy was old, and had bad knees, but what about him makes him a "smitty?" Not the fact that he's old. Or has physical ailments. I know plenty o' fantastic umpires that are old guys. Neat as a pin, knowledgable of the rules, hustle, great judgment, etc. Just because he's old, or has a bad back, or bad knees doesn't make him a Smitty, which is what we're talking about here. Smitties come in all ages, shapes, sizes, genders and races.

Putting up with "old guards" sounds like ageism to me, which is not cool at all.:(

canadaump6 Wed Jun 18, 2008 10:49pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve
First, how did this guy come up with "rabbit" for 2nd base umpire in a 4 man crew? All three base umpires have to do some running on every play just about.

Second, the guy was old, and had bad knees, but what about him makes him a "smitty?" Not the fact that he's old. Or has physical ailments. I know plenty o' fantastic umpires that are old guys. Neat as a pin, knowledgable of the rules, hustle, great judgment, etc. Just because he's old, or has a bad back, or bad knees doesn't make him a Smitty, which is what we're talking about here. Smitties come in all ages, shapes, sizes, genders and races.

Putting up with "old guards" sounds like ageism to me, which is not cool at all.:(

I wasn't calling this guy a smitty, but he proved himself to be an old guard by trying to throw his weight around.

The "rabbit" is the term I've always heard people use for 2nd base, while 3rd base is called the "rocking chair". But you're right, you have to do some running at every position, just more going in and out at 2nd base.

socalblue1 Thu Jun 19, 2008 03:40am

Quote:

Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve
First, how did this guy come up with "rabbit" for 2nd base umpire in a 4 man crew? All three base umpires have to do some running on every play just about.

Second, the guy was old, and had bad knees, but what about him makes him a "smitty?" Not the fact that he's old. Or has physical ailments. I know plenty o' fantastic umpires that are old guys. Neat as a pin, knowledgable of the rules, hustle, great judgment, etc. Just because he's old, or has a bad back, or bad knees doesn't make him a Smitty, which is what we're talking about here. Smitties come in all ages, shapes, sizes, genders and races.

Putting up with "old guards" sounds like ageism to me, which is not cool at all.:(

Steve,

"Rabbit" is a long standing term for U2 in a 4 umpire crew as he goes out on far more plays than U1 & U3 combined.

IMO in regard to the OP - this umpire is being a Smittie by barging into the rotation and forcing someone to change for his convenience.

SanDiegoSteve Thu Jun 19, 2008 04:07am

Quote:

Originally Posted by socalblue1
Steve,

"Rabbit" is a long standing term for U2 in a 4 umpire crew as he goes out on far more plays than U1 & U3 combined.

I am unfamiliar with the phrase. Learn something new every day.

Quote:

Originally Posted by socalblue1

IMO in regard to the OP - this umpire is being a Smittie by barging into the rotation and forcing someone to change for his convenience.

You have a point there. That is kind of Smitty come to think of it.

Rich Thu Jun 19, 2008 06:39am

Quote:

Originally Posted by socalblue1
Steve,

"Rabbit" is a long standing term for U2 in a 4 umpire crew as he goes out on far more plays than U1 & U3 combined.

IMO in regard to the OP - this umpire is being a Smittie by barging into the rotation and forcing someone to change for his convenience.

What's a word for digging a trench in the dirt as you go from U3 to second base over and over and over and over again.

Huskerblue Thu Jun 19, 2008 11:25am

Groundhoggin'!!!!

BigUmp56 Thu Jun 19, 2008 01:26pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by canadaump6
Tuss,

I can relate. Had a situation at CDP 2 years ago where I had just done 2nd base in a 4 man system and was excited about our scheduled rotation that would have me at 1st base for an important game.

Then along comes an older umpire, who hadn't done the previous game with us but jumps on our crew anyways and tells me "you're young- my knees are to sore to be the rabbit". So having had to put up with old guards all week, I gave in and did second base a second time. Boo.

I agree with you that this guy overstepped in doing this. Would you have felt differently had he given you the courtesy of asking if it was alright with you to switch positions with him?

Tim.

canadaump6 Thu Jun 19, 2008 02:23pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigUmp56
I agree with you that this guy overstepped in doing this. Would you have felt differently had he given you the courtesy of asking if it was alright with you to switch positions with him?

Tim.

If he had asked whether I would be willing to take 2nd, I would have said that I'd really prefer to do first. I certainly would have felt differently. I am sure he would have been just fine doing 2nd base on Little League sized diamonds anyways.

CO ump Thu Jun 19, 2008 02:48pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by aceholleran
In my neck of the woods, we don't throw names like that around.

If anyone was a pantywaist, it was the veteran ref who couldn't own up to his own mistake, yet decided to subject his audience to a long diatribe, when he, in fact, was the erring ref. He deserved every bit of my treatment. That was the point of my post.

Ace


Quote:

Originally Posted by aceholleran
I was on his board. ...
I knew I was leaving the board soon, so I stood up and asked, "Hey Frank--who worked that game?" He sat down, speechless, and the room cracked up.

Sorry ACE
Based on your post it appeared to me that the only reason you stood up and embarrassed the man is because you were "leaving the board soon".
If he deserved every bit of your treatment I would think he deserved it whether or not you were leaving the board.

But you're probably right, I shouldn't be so cavalier about throwing out a word like coward.
There's probably better ones to describe officials that will publicly embarrass their fellow brothers and then not stick around to face them.

TussAgee11 Thu Jun 19, 2008 04:51pm

Umm, to be fair, I believe that this whole thread has bashed our "brother officials."

90% of officials talk about the other 10% (normally behind their backs). The other 10% don't talk to anyone, because they are smitties.

At least Ace did it to the guy's face, not because of a problem he had with him as an official, but as a person. Honestly, who stands in front of a room lecturing about how to do something without admitting they made the mistake too... maybe a politician. Sometimes you gotta do what's right... and expose people for who they really are, especially when their peers are eating every word of what they are saying...

mbyron Thu Jun 19, 2008 06:01pm

10%? The percentage of smitties in my association is somewhat higher.

BigUmp56 Thu Jun 19, 2008 06:07pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by mbyron
10%? The percentage of smitties in my association is somewhat higher.

Around here 90% of our umpires are half "Smittys."


Tim.

SanDiegoSteve Thu Jun 19, 2008 06:17pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by canadaump6
If he had asked whether I would be willing to take 2nd, I would have said that I'd really prefer to do first. I certainly would have felt differently. I am sure he would have been just fine doing 2nd base on Little League sized diamonds anyways.

Yeah, it's pretty lame to not be able to get around on 60 ft. bases. I thought you were working on a big diamond the way he was begging off taking second base. I mean, how far do you really have to run on the small diamond? (rhetorical)

LMan Thu Jun 19, 2008 06:35pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigUmp56
Around here 90% of our umpires are half "Smittys."


Tim.


60% of the time, it works every time.

BigUmp56 Thu Jun 19, 2008 07:01pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by LMan
60% of the time, it works every time.

At this mathematical pace we'll have a fastball rising in no time...........


Tim.

Welpe Thu Jun 19, 2008 07:13pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigUmp56
At this mathematical pace we'll have a fastball rising in no time...........


Tim.

Only if you reach 88 mph.

waltjp Thu Jun 19, 2008 09:41pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by LMan
60% of the time, it works every time.

98% of statistisics are made up on the spot.

TussAgee11 Thu Jun 19, 2008 09:41pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by LMan
60% of the time, it works every time.

Sounds like Yogi...

"90% of this game is half mental!"

"Nobody goes there anymore, its too crowded."


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:18am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1