![]() |
|
|
|||
A couple of obstruction questions (OBR)
OBR rules. Type B obstruction.
#1. R2. 0 out. The batter singles to RF. R2 holds at 2nd base thinking the right fielder might catch the ball. The BR rounds 1st base and collides with F3. Obstruction is indicated. The BR continues to run to 2nd base where both R2 and the BR are standing on 2nd base. The defensive players tags both runners. What is the call? #2. R1,R2,R3. 0 out. The batter doubles and both R3 and R2 score. R1 is obstructed while rounding 3rd base. He continues home where he is safe at the plate. On the throw home, the BR attempts to go to 3rd base. The catcher throws to 3rd base where the BR is called out. Does the play stand? |
|
|||
Sit 1. Because of the obstruction on the BR you would have awarded him 2nd and R2 would be forced to advanve. So no Outs, R2 & R3.
Sit . Yes the play stands. R1 was awarded home no protection given to trailing runners. |
|
|||
Since you are using OBR...
just to clarify on your first situation... If you as the umpire protected him to second base or beyond, then you would award him that base and move along any forced runners. Since the BR got to 2nd safely anyways, it appears as though you should have at least protected him to there, in order to nullify the act of OBS. |
|
|||
Quote:
2. Sounds like Type A obstruction in this. The ball is immediately dead and all runners including BR are awarded bases accordingly.
__________________
I have nipples, Greg. Can you milk me? Last edited by Steven Tyler; Sun Apr 13, 2008 at 10:26pm. |
|
|||
1. Since R2 is not forced to advance, he is entitled to second base, and BR would not have gotten to second. My judgment almost certainly would be that absent the obstruction, BR would have noticed R2 still at second and would have successfully retreated to first. Since it's Type B obstruction, BR is not entltled to at least one base, which would have forced R2 to third. So BR is now R1 and R2 is still R2, no outs, let's play.
2. Unless the obstruction somehow enabled F2 to make the play at third (I dunno, didn't waste any time trying to tag R1 since he was going to be protected home anyway?), I have BR out at third. Type B obstruction is delayed dead ball, and the "penalty" is nullifying the obstruction. |
|
|||
From J/R: R2, one out. The batter hits a pop fly to shallow right-center field. Misplayed, the ball drops amidst three fielders. R2 is unable to advance and has returned to second. The batter-runner rounds first agressively (c) and is obstructed, but continues to advance to second without hesitation. He is able to reach second, and jointly occupies it with R2, when both runners are tagged: the batter-runner (following runner) is out. He is required to realize that R2 has not advanced. The obstruction does not give him license to ignore the actions of his teammate while advancing.
|
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
Play #1 we have batter-runner protected to 2B (At most) on the obstruction. As he reached the protected base safely the obstruction is ignored. If protected to 1B he may attempt to advance as his own risk. either way the obstruction is nullified No fault of the defense that R2 failed to advance. Batter-runner is out on the tag & R2 remains at 2B. Play #2 the obstructed runner (R1) reached his protected base. Plkay continues without reference to the obstruction, batter-runner out at 3B. |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers |
|
|||
Quote:
So I would have the BR protected to first, and out at second. |
|
|||
Quote:
OP had ball going to the catcher and catcher throwing to 3B.
__________________
I have nipples, Greg. Can you milk me? |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Couple of questions | GFD406 | Football | 19 | Thu May 03, 2007 03:26pm |
A couple of questions | DC_Ref12 | Basketball | 17 | Tue Apr 24, 2007 02:22am |
Couple of Questions | gostars | Basketball | 3 | Tue Jan 11, 2005 11:22pm |
Couple Questions | Patsfan2431 | Football | 3 | Sun Sep 05, 2004 06:35pm |
Many thanks and a couple questions. | OfficialFan | Basketball | 7 | Sun Jan 25, 2004 01:49pm |