The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Baseball (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/)
-   -   Leather (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/41388-leather.html)

bossman72 Sat Jan 26, 2008 07:29pm

Leather
 
Who here uses patent leather and who uses regular leather for their belt and shoes?

blue31sf Sat Jan 26, 2008 07:34pm

Dressing the game
 
Patent shoes and belt. Shouldn't mix and match. Never a leather belt.

That;s just me

Tim C Sat Jan 26, 2008 08:27pm

And,
 
I would never be caught dead wearing patent leather anything.

Regards,

canadaump6 Sat Jan 26, 2008 09:08pm

Patent leather belt for me, and regular leather shoes. I would never even consider purchasing leather ball bags.

SanDiegoSteve Sat Jan 26, 2008 09:18pm

Liked to wear patent leather belts. They look very sharp. Also liked navy blue leather belts from Mizuno Japan. Always kept my leather shoes as shiny as patent with various formulas, such as Shape-Up, or with Kiwi Parade Gloss and elbow grease.

bob jenkins Sat Jan 26, 2008 09:43pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tim C
I would never be caught dead wearing patent leather anything.

Regards,

Ditto.

justanotherblue Sat Jan 26, 2008 09:45pm

Was told I had to wear a patent leather belt last year, new assignor this year, belt is being put in the bag and kept there.

briancurtin Sat Jan 26, 2008 10:20pm

i used to have a patent leather belt but i got away from that. never had patent leather shoes -- always regular leather but taken care of and always shined.
im a regular leather guy all around now.

Lawrence.Dorsey Sat Jan 26, 2008 10:55pm

I've had a patent leather belt for about 5 years now. I am debating about whether to use it or not this year . I may get a new traditional leather belt and use the patent as a backup.

I now have patent leather shoes (GD). It was not my intention but after my previous pair of plate shoes started to wear out, I couldn't find anything that I really liked fit wise. Not having to polish them is nice, but I did have a nick in them after only about 5 plate jobs and I had to break out the leather luster to get it "fixed". Not as easy as covering a traditional leather scratch. I would have much preferred to get the GD's in traditional leather.

Lawrence

Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. Sat Jan 26, 2008 10:56pm

The last time I wore patent leather shoes and belt (the color of both was white) was on the golf course in the 1970's. :D

I like well shined shoes for umpiring (both baseball and fastpitch softball) and officiating basketball. Two weeks ago I officiated a basketball game and my partner also umpires college baseball. He wore patent leather shoes and belted slacks (western cut pockets) with a black patent leather belt. He looked terrible.

MTD, Sr.

kylejt Sun Jan 27, 2008 12:21am

I've got both the belt and plate shoes in patent leather. I like the shoes, the belt is just okay. I like to change things up a lot, and a few of my partners roll with vans full of everything except a base coat. Gotta be prepared.

For those that pooh-pooh patent leather, yet still continue to use navy ball bags, well........

kylejt Sun Jan 27, 2008 12:28am

Quote:

Originally Posted by briancurtin
im a regular leather guy all around now.

Got it!
http://www.losanjealous.com/img/vill...ge_people1.jpg

In the Navy.....

bossman72 Sun Jan 27, 2008 01:48pm

why do some of you guys swear off patent leather?

Tim C Sun Jan 27, 2008 02:32pm

Well,
 
I think it is a terrible design idea (much like the Edsel).

Taking fashion advice from MLB umpires lead to the NL "Disco" style of collars outside coat lapels. This is the same idea.

Patent Leather looks fine on MaryJanes but not umpire equipment.

Regards,

briancurtin Sun Jan 27, 2008 02:45pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by kylejt
Got it!

In the Navy.....

damn. it was only a matter of time before my real identity came out.

justanotherblue Sun Jan 27, 2008 02:55pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by bossman72
why do some of you guys swear off patent leather?


I think it's great for Marine parade dress, I just don't feel it belongs on a baseball field.

kylejt Sun Jan 27, 2008 03:29pm

I like those dark pants with every top combo, except blue shirts and jackets.

canadaump6 Sun Jan 27, 2008 03:39pm

Heather grey for me.

bob jenkins Sun Jan 27, 2008 06:14pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by msavakinas

dark gray slacks or regular heather gray?

Heather for HS, dark for college

johnnyg08 Mon Jan 28, 2008 10:33am

I just got the darker plate pants for this season and I'm super stoked about them...they certainly don't give them away, but they seem to be better quality than the heather gray ones...JMO

Rcichon Mon Jan 28, 2008 12:09pm

Leather
 
I own nothing in patent leather.

bbsbvb83 Mon Jan 28, 2008 01:49pm

Patent leather shoes and belt for plate.
Regular leather shoes and belt for bases.
I need a new regular leather belt before the HS season begins in March.
I will probably go with the 1 3/4" from Honigs, but $20 for a belt just seems wrong.
In southern Illinois, sometimes that is half a game fee.

waltjp Mon Jan 28, 2008 02:16pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by kylejt
For those that pooh-pooh patent leather, yet still continue to use navy ball bags, well........

What does one have to do with the other?

BigGuy Mon Jan 28, 2008 02:16pm

No matter what - sometimes it's a personal preference, sometimes it's what you can find at the time you need to replace.

Tim C Mon Jan 28, 2008 03:45pm

~Sigh~
 
"Originally Posted by kylejt

"For those that pooh-pooh patent leather, yet still continue to use navy ball bags, well........ "



I do not own any navy ball bags.

Regards,

jkumpire Mon Jan 28, 2008 05:18pm

I must protest
 
I use a Patent Leather belt, and I use shoes well finished with Leather Luster. And yes, I use Navy Ball bags too. To make things even worse, I picked up a couple of Honigs Leather ball bags this year, and I will use them at least once.

I like the look and easy care of the patent leather stuff, and the leather ball bags seem to handle a lot of baseballs without flopping all over the place. I also have ump-attire and Carlucci bags, and they don't work as well as the leather ones, which surprise me no end. There has not been a good bag made since the Kangaroo Bags of the 1980's, and I still own one, but it is shot, and I have not found one that works as good ever since. Since Honig's is selling them for $5 each, I decided to try them. I stuffed five or six baseballs in one, and they did not lose shape badly, nor stick out like even the ump-attire bags do. And my ump-attire bags are only 2 years old, and they are faded like mad. They just did not last well.

I can understand those who don't like the patent leather look, but clean up is easy on the shoes, the patent leather does not stain my clothes like regular leather belts do, since I sweat a lot, and I like the look. With some of the dusty and dirty fields I work on, it got to the point I was polishing shoes every night, and going through top quality polish like nobody's business. Now, it's one can of Pledge a season, and a can of Leather Luster every two or three years.

Sadly, even Leather Luster does not seem to work with the leather shoes I officiate wrestling in, being on the mat so much wear the Leather Luster off the toes quickly, so it may be back to polish every night. Oh well.....

bossman72 Mon Jan 28, 2008 05:55pm

my state requires navy ball bags to be worn. however in the summer when i'm permitted to wear black and creme shirts, i wear a black hat and ball bags with them

socalblue1 Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:29am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tim C
"Originally Posted by kylejt

"For those that pooh-pooh patent leather, yet still continue to use navy ball bags, well........ "



I do not own any navy ball bags.

Regards,

Same here. One or our college associations does require high gloss belts and dark pants (Honigs polywool or Davis). The assigner equates high gloss = patent leather. Choice is patent belt or no games.

SanDiegoSteve Tue Jan 29, 2008 02:31am

Quote:

Originally Posted by socalblue1
Same here. One or our college associations does require high gloss belts and dark pants (Honigs polywool or Davis). The assigner equates high gloss = patent leather. Choice is patent belt or no games.

Very similar here. May be a regional thing. If your belt doesn't shine, you look terrible IMO. Either shine up your leather belt to a brilliant gloss (i.e., hard work) or wear patent leather belt (much easier). A dull belt gets a lower rating here.

bossman72 Tue Jan 29, 2008 06:25pm

Thanks for the responses. I asked this because I wear regular leather, yet when I see college and MiLB umps in my area, the vast majority of them have patent leather. I just wondered what you all thought about the two...

David B Tue Feb 05, 2008 12:06pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tim C
I think it is a terrible design idea (much like the Edsel).

Taking fashion advice from MLB umpires lead to the NL "Disco" style of collars outside coat lapels. This is the same idea.

Patent Leather looks fine on MaryJanes but not umpire equipment.

Regards,

I agree. Takes me back to high school days - hated it then and hate it now.

Thansk
David

Interested Ump Wed Feb 06, 2008 02:12am

Quote:

Originally Posted by bossman72
Who here uses patent leather and who uses regular leather for their belt and shoes?

Inconsequential

gordon30307 Wed Feb 06, 2008 10:15am

Lets see patent leather vs. leather. After 5 minutes on a dusty field can't tell the difference anyways so who cares. I use patent leather easy clean up after the game. A couple of squirts of water and your good to go.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:32pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1