The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Baseball (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/)
-   -   Roger Clemens (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/40808-roger-clemens.html)

Cub42 Fri Jan 11, 2008 11:58pm

Good Point
 
Pete makes a good point. The players didn't do themselves any favors by stonewalling the issue for years. But the MLB Grand Poohbah's seemed to turn a blind eye to this as long as TV ratings and record revenue poured in. My point is that you can't convict all of the players. This Mcnamee is less than a credible witness.

SAump Sat Jan 12, 2008 01:13am

Accomplices, why didn't I think of that?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cub42
Pete makes a good point. The players didn't do themselves any favors by stonewalling the issue for years. But the MLB Grand Poohbah's seemed to turn a blind eye to this as long as TV ratings and record revenue poured in. My point is that you can't convict all of the players. This Mcnamee is less than a credible witness.

The next investigation will seek players who knew of steroid use and didn't report it to their superiors.
Mr. Torre, I would like to ask you some questions about the bad things that took place while you were in command.
I can't explain why MLB owners can't take responsibility, but Mr. Steinbrenner (Sp?), thank you for stepping down.
Duty, honor, courage. ;)

Dakota Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:33pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cub42
...This Mcnamee is less than a credible witness.

Less credible than Clemens?

McNamee had a strong self-interest in telling the truth, whatever the truth may be.

Clemens has a strong self-interest in denying taking steroids, whatever the truth may be.

So, which is less credible?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:01pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1