CO ump |
Thu Aug 09, 2007 02:59pm |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Ives
It isn't MY payback book.
Apparently you didn't notice that the Monday plunk was "accepted". It was the Tuesday plunk that was judged as being over the line.
|
Judged by whom? A-Rod, the Yankees? The umpire?
If I'm the retaliator, I'm not too concerned with what the retaliatee thinks or the umpire. If more payback is deemed necessary then you take the consequences that come with it.
As I'm writing this I'm realizing that we're not on the same track.
I think what you're saying is that 2 HBP was over the line relative to the umpires judgement and what an umpire should allow or turn a blind eye to.
I was coming from the perspective of the offended. There's no rule, written or not that tells me how much hide I can extract in my payback.
I just have to weigh my primal desires against the consequences.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Ives
If you're going to umpire grown-up ball you'd better learn the unwritten part of the game.
|
I agree my thought process as an umpire is much different than that of a retaliator
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Ives
And perhaps you should use the wink ;) to show you're kidding.
|
I thought all good umpires would be insightful enough to catch the sarcasm;)
|