The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Baseball (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/)
-   -   Media Idiots (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/34895-media-idiots.html)

umpduck11 Mon May 21, 2007 11:58pm

Media Idiots
 
In our local fishwrapper Saturday edition, there was an interesting photograph from the 4A State High School Championship series. It showed a player with his forearm about head-level to the opposing catcher, as he was crossing the plate. The caption read that the runner was ejected by the plate umpire for "runner interference". In the accompanying article, they also
were kind enough to mention the plate umpire by name.... how nice of them. :rolleyes:

ozzy6900 Tue May 22, 2007 06:12am

Quote:

Originally Posted by umpduck11
In our local fishwrapper Saturday edition, there was an interesting photograph from the 4A State High School Championship series. It showed a player with his forearm about head-level to the opposing catcher, as he was crossing the plate. The caption read that the runner was ejected by the plate umpire for "runner interference". In the accompanying article, they also
were kind enough to mention the plate umpire by name.... how nice of them. :rolleyes:

And your point is........................................?

SanDiegoSteve Tue May 22, 2007 01:04pm

Perhaps (just speculating) the point is that the runner was actually ejected for Malicious Contact, as there was no interference, and Duck is just pointing out how writers usually are ignorant of the rules. Also naming the umpire implying that it was a bad call may have something to do with it, too.

bob jenkins Tue May 22, 2007 01:06pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve
Perhaps (just speculating) the point is that the runner was actually ejected for Malicious Contact, as there was no interference,

MC is interference.

Otherwise, I agree.

SanDiegoSteve Tue May 22, 2007 01:16pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by bob jenkins
MC is interference.

Not always. What if there were no play on the runner, like the ball was cut off and relayed to 2nd base, and the runner crashed the catcher? How would that be interference?

LDUB Tue May 22, 2007 01:40pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve
Not always. What if there were no play on the runner, like the ball was cut off and relayed to 2nd base, and the runner crashed the catcher? How would that be interference?

Malicious contact is a type of interference.

SanDiegoSteve Tue May 22, 2007 01:53pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by LDUB
Malicious contact is a type of interference.

Oh, another FEDspeak thing. I get it.

umpduck11 Tue May 22, 2007 07:22pm

I wasn't very clear in my OP, as the runner did give the catcher a forearm shiver. There was no "true" interference, as no play was being made on runner by the catcher, and he didn't have possession of the ball.
To be honest, I never considered MC as interference, just as a safety/sportsmanship issue.

tribefan1952 Tue May 22, 2007 10:41pm

Malicious contact is malicious contact. Interference is interference. Sometimes they happen simultaneously, but not always. This sounds like malicious contact to me, but i wasn't there.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:50pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1