The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Baseball (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/)
-   -   Most rule calls?????? (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/30729-most-rule-calls.html)

PFISTO Tue Jan 09, 2007 06:28pm

Most rule calls??????
 
Good evening,
I was just sitting here going over the 2007 NFHS rules and I was wondering besides balls and strikes and plays at any base what type of call do you see the most. I mean calls like interference, obstruction, pitching infractions, batting out of order. Calls that would make you reference the rule code. I hope I asked this question clearly.
Thanks mike

Tim C Tue Jan 09, 2007 06:39pm

OK Mike,
 
Since my New Year's Resolution is to have NO ONE on my ignore list in 2007:

In order of importance to me:

1) Safe/Out
2) Fair/Foul
3) Ball/Strike
4) Balks
5) NFHS Re-entry
6) Batter Interference
7) FPSR
8) Catcher Interference
9) Fielder/Runner Contact (i.e. obstruction/interference)
10)Malicious Contact


Dare I say:

Since I have not had a "too dumb to bat in order" call in 15 years now I'll have at least two this year.

I should add somewhere the new NFHS "going to the mouth" since it has been called one way (the easy way) for decades I will need to pay more attention.

"One Rule ~ One Interpretation ~ One Mechanic"

Edited: as socalblue reminded me:"Surprise is the umpires enemy!"

etn_ump Tue Jan 09, 2007 08:01pm

Great reply, Tim!

p.s. I'd hate to see your business card, that's quite a title!

socalblue1 Tue Jan 09, 2007 09:13pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tim C
Since my New Year's Resolution is to have NO ONE on my ignore list in 2007:

In order of importance to me:

1) Ball/Strike
2) Fair/Foul
3) Safe/Out
4) Balks
5) NFHS Re-entry
6) Batter Interference
7) FPSR
8) Catcher Interference
9) Fielder/Runner Contact (i.e. obstruction/interference)
10)Malicious Contact


Dare I say:

Since I have not had a "too dumb to bat in order" call in 15 years now I'll have at least two this year.

I should add somewhere the new NFHS "going to the mouth" since it has been called one way (the easy way) for decades I will need to pay more attention.

"One Rule ~ One Interpretation ~ One Mechanic"

Tim,

The only change I would make on my list would moving 1 to 3. Think back to JE & what he advises ....

bossman72 Tue Jan 09, 2007 09:33pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by PFISTO
Good evening,
I was just sitting here going over the 2007 NFHS rules and I was wondering besides balls and strikes and plays at any base what type of call do you see the most. I mean calls like interference, obstruction, pitching infractions, batting out of order. Calls that would make you reference the rule code. I hope I asked this question clearly.
Thanks mike


Regarding the "odd" calls- you see balks more often than the rest. Re-entry occurrs nearly every game, so you'll see the sub rule quite frequently.

Last year i had 2 or 3 batter's int calls, 2 or 3 catcher's int calls, 1 maybe 2 int calls in the field, 1 maybe 2 obstruction calls, zero FPSR calls and zero malicious contact calls.

REALLY rare ones i had this year-
*Batted ball hit Base Umpire in C position
*Fly ball, ball hits F8's mitt and pops up, R2 leaves bag, F8 then catches ball. (I had to correct my partner who forgot the rule and messed up the subsequent appeal)
*Seen an aluminum bat break (no rule reference here, just thought it was noteable :) ).


If you're asking this question to see which rules you need to "know better," you should learn them all. These things happen very rarely, but it's your job to know what to do when they happen.

DG Tue Jan 09, 2007 09:35pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tim C
Since my New Year's Resolution is to have NO ONE on my ignore list in 2007:

In order of importance to me:

1) Ball/Strike
2) Fair/Foul
3) Safe/Out
4) Balks
5) NFHS Re-entry
6) Batter Interference
7) FPSR
8) Catcher Interference
9) Fielder/Runner Contact (i.e. obstruction/interference)
10)Malicious Contact


Dare I say:

Since I have not had a "too dumb to bat in order" call in 15 years now I'll have at least two this year.

I should add somewhere the new NFHS "going to the mouth" since it has been called one way (the easy way) for decades I will need to pay more attention.

"One Rule ~ One Interpretation ~ One Mechanic"

It may be regional, so for my area I would reorganize. It has been a very long time since I have seen MC in a high school game. I also don't see many re-entry questions.
1) Ball/Strike
2) Fair/Foul
3) Safe/Out
4) Players out of the dugout without helmets
5) FPSR
6) Balks
7) Obstruction
8) Batter interference
9) Catcher interference
10) Runner interference

I never bring a rule book onto the field.

SAump Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:22pm

D3K and IFR
 
Has to be up there near 4 and 5.

PFISTO Wed Jan 10, 2007 05:43am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tim C
Since my New Year's Resolution is to have NO ONE on my ignore list in 2007:

In order of importance to me:

1) Safe/Out
2) Fair/Foul
3) Ball/Strike
4) Balks
5) NFHS Re-entry
6) Batter Interference
7) FPSR
8) Catcher Interference
9) Fielder/Runner Contact (i.e. obstruction/interference)
10)Malicious Contact




Dare I say:

Since I have not had a "too dumb to bat in order" call in 15 years now I'll have at least two this year.

I should add somewhere the new NFHS "going to the mouth" since it has been called one way (the easy way) for decades I will need to pay more attention.

"One Rule ~ One Interpretation ~ One Mechanic"

Edited: as socalblue reminded me:"Surprise is the umpires enemy!"

These are just the answers I was looking for. Tim C nice answer and it's nice to see you putting things behind you it will only make this a better place to visit. And as far as knowing all the rules I would agree as that is my goal.
Thanks Mike :)

SAump Wed Jan 10, 2007 06:56am

Teams Must Flow Btwn 1/2-Innings
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SAump
Has to be up there near 4 and 5.

8 prep. pitches 1st ing. and 6 afterward to be completed within 1 minute

lawump Wed Jan 10, 2007 09:04am

There was a big discussion among the bigwigs in our state (I'm not one of them...but I was subsequently asked for my opinion by one of the bigwigs) about the following:

NFHS Rules apply: R1 and 0, 1 or 2 outs.

What is the penalty for a pitcher, who while in contact with the rubber in the stretch position but prior to coming set (that is, for example, he's looking in to get the signs from the catcher) goes to his mouth with his non-glove hand?

What is the penalty: ball or balk?

I'll tell you what I concluded later. But from what I understand this became a very heated discussion between the different regional booking secretaries and the statewide league office. The statewide league office issued a directive as to what the penalty will be in our state...but a number of people don't agree with it.

johnnyg08 Wed Jan 10, 2007 12:24pm

at first read sound like a "ball" to me...might be nice to see it though.

bossman72 Wed Jan 10, 2007 01:50pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by lawump
There was a big discussion among the bigwigs in our state (I'm not one of them...but I was subsequently asked for my opinion by one of the bigwigs) about the following:

NFHS Rules apply: R1 and 0, 1 or 2 outs.

What is the penalty for a pitcher, who while in contact with the rubber in the stretch position but prior to coming set (that is, for example, he's looking in to get the signs from the catcher) goes to his mouth with his non-glove hand?

What is the penalty: ball or balk?

I'll tell you what I concluded later. But from what I understand this became a very heated discussion between the different regional booking secretaries and the statewide league office. The statewide league office issued a directive as to what the penalty will be in our state...but a number of people don't agree with it.


Balk since in FED, doing any movements that aren't related to throwing/pitching/coming set are balks (such as adjusting your cap or shaking the signs off with your glove).

Had he gone to his mouth, stepped on the rubber, and delivered a pitch, it would be an illegal pitch and a balk.


However, i think the new rule for 2007 states that it's a ball no matter what now, although i'm not sure about this by any means.

DG Wed Jan 10, 2007 08:14pm

casebook 6.2.1 SITUATION A: F1 places his pitching hand on his mouth and distinctly wipes off his pitching hand prior to touching the ball (b) while touching the pitcher's plate. RULING: (b) illegal, a ball shall be awarded to the batter.

You did not say whether he wiped it off or not. If he does BALL, if not BALK. I can't find another reference or case play to call this balk. Carl will probably cover the change in BRD. It was item 363 in last year's issue.

This appears to be a rule change for 2007.

MadCityRef Wed Jan 10, 2007 11:13pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by SAump
8 prep. pitches 1st ing. and 6 afterward to be completed within 1 minute

And all this time I've been giving 8 and 5.

SanDiegoSteve Thu Jan 11, 2007 01:30am

Quote:

Originally Posted by SAump
8 prep. pitches 1st ing. and 6 afterward to be completed within 1 minute

Is this a new rule? An extra pitch now?

GarthB Thu Jan 11, 2007 01:45am

"Control of the ballgame is the difference between umpires that show up for the players and the managers."

Did Bruce really say that? It makes no sense. The thought is incomplete. When you say something "is the difference between..." you need two items to show the difference.

So control of the ballgame is the difference between umpires that (sic) show up for the players and managers, and what?

BigUmp56 Thu Jan 11, 2007 03:58am

Quote:

Originally Posted by GarthB

So control of the ballgame is the difference between umpires that (sic) show up for the players and managers, and what?


Hot dog and a Coke?


Tim.

buckeyetc71 Thu Jan 11, 2007 06:30am

I thought it was 8 and 5 also, did this change?

gotblue? Thu Jan 11, 2007 08:37am

Quote:

So control of the ballgame is the difference between umpires that (sic) show up for the players and managers, and what?
Is it ... the difference between umpires that [sic] show up for the players, and those who show up for the managers?

That reading would make it more of a complete thought, but has any umpire ever showed up for the managers, but not for the players?

Tim C Thu Jan 11, 2007 10:48am

"8 prep. pitches 1st ing. and 6 afterward to be completed within 1 minute"

Must be a Texas JV game rule.

One Rule ~ One Interpretation ~ One Mechanic

Skahtboi Thu Jan 11, 2007 11:15am

Quote:

Originally Posted by GarthB
"Control of the ballgame is the difference between umpires that show up for the players and the managers."

Did Bruce really say that? It makes no sense. The thought is incomplete. When you say something "is the difference between..." you need two items to show the difference.

So control of the ballgame is the difference between umpires that (sic) show up for the players and managers, and what?

According to Baseball Almanac, Froemming did indeed say those exact words! You can check out the quotes by clicking here.

SAump Fri Jan 12, 2007 07:13am

See More Often
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by PFISTO
Good evening,
I was just sitting here STOP and I was wondering STOP what type of call do you see the most. STOP I mean calls like interference, obstruction, pitching infractions, batting out of order. STOP Calls that would make you reference the rule code. STOP I hope I asked this question clearly.STOP
Thanks mike

1 Game 2 Teams 3 Strikes 4 Balls 5 Skills 6 Outs 7 Innings 8 Warm-up Pitches 9 Players 10-Run Rule

Dave Hensley Fri Jan 12, 2007 08:33am

Quote:

Originally Posted by buckeyetc71
I thought it was 8 and 5 also, did this change?

Maybe that's one of those new innovative mechanics they teach at that San Antonio clinic he's touting. :)

SAump Fri Jan 12, 2007 09:17pm

A Better LL/OBR Rule
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave Hensley
Maybe that's one of those new innovative mechanics they teach at that San Antonio clinic he's touting. :)

Don't the FED/NCAA rulemakes realize the situation? A ball leads to a walk, a walk leads to a runner, a leadoff runner leads to a run, and a run leads to a longer game. I don't even want to get into an ejection report, let me just say I would have saved more time ignoring the ONE extra pitch. The PITCH at best warrants a "don't do that" and at worse should be completly ignored.

BigUmp56 Fri Jan 12, 2007 09:23pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by SAump
Don't the FED/NCAA rulemakes realize the situation? A ball leads to a walk, a walk leads to a runner, a leadoff runner leads to a run, and a run leads to a longer game. I don't even want to get into an ejection report, let me just say I would have saved more time ignoring the ONE extra pitch. The PITCH at best warrants a "don't do that" and at worse should be completly ignored.

Translation = "I didn't know it was only five pitches."


Tim.

SAump Fri Jan 12, 2007 09:43pm

Eval Report
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BigUmp56
Translation = "I didn't know it was only five pitches."

Tim.

SAump doesn't count pitches. :D

SanDiegoSteve Sat Jan 13, 2007 02:45am

Quote:

Originally Posted by GarthB
"Control of the ballgame is the difference between umpires that show up for the players and the managers."

Did Bruce really say that? It makes no sense. The thought is incomplete. When you say something "is the difference between..." you need two items to show the difference.

So control of the ballgame is the difference between umpires that (sic) show up for the players and managers, and what?

I think Bruce meant to say that control of the ballgame is the difference between umpires that show up for the players and the managers and the ones that just want a paycheck and hide behind their partners. You know, from the previous sentence? Bruce just didn't state it properly.

SanDiegoSteve Sat Jan 13, 2007 02:47am

Guess it's time to pick a new signature line.:cool:

SAump Sun Jan 14, 2007 01:33pm

Most Common Rule 2.00
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SAump
1 Game 2 Teams 3 Strikes 4 Balls 5 Skills 6 Outs 7 Innings 8 Warm-up Pitches 9 Players 10-Run Rule

Common Terms Part 2 - Neutral
1 Field 2 Play 3 Fair Ball 4 Foul Ball/Tip 5 Dead Ball 6 Conference 7 Award 8 Penalty 9 Re-enter 10 Malicious Contact
Common Terms Part 3 - Offense
1 Safe 2 Batter 3 Runner 4 Substitute 5 DH 6 Base on Balls 7 Slide 8 HBP 9 Bunt 10 Retouch 11 Interference
Common Terms Part 4 - Defense
1 Fielders 2 Catch 3 Pitch 4 Force 5 Tag 6 Third Strike Not Caught 7 Infield Fly 8 Balk 9 Obstruction 10 Forfeit
Note: Parts 1-4 were done on the FLY and still under construction.
Note: Part 5 - Scoring and other things were left off the list. Ex. Plate, Box, Batted Ball, Time, H, E, FC, SAC, K, DP, SB, etc.

PeteBooth Mon Jan 15, 2007 10:32am

Quote:

Quote:

Originally Posted by PFISTO
Good evening,
I was just sitting here going over the 2007 NFHS rules and I was wondering besides balls and strikes and plays at any base what type of call do you see the most. I mean calls like interference, obstruction, pitching infractions, batting out of order. Calls that would make you reference the rule code. I hope I asked this question clearly.
Thanks mike


Tee gave you an excelllent list but in a FED game I would know and be able to auote the rules for when a ball is immediately dead vs. delayed dead and also the base awards.

In the FED rule book they have a concise table concerning the aforementioned.

Another rule that doesn't come up from game to game but you need to know is the Malicious Contact Rule.

Example:

B1 is obstructed by F3 rounding first base but B1 levels F3. In OBR (even in LL), you let play continue until it's completion. You penalize the OBS and you might have an EJ.

In FED, the Malicous act Supercedes the OBS and you call B1 out.

A coach might request time and ask "Hey Blue why isn't the OBS penalized, I can replace the ejected player with a bench player and put him on second base.

Pete Booth


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:12pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1