The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Baseball (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/)
-   -   interference??? (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/27221-interference.html)

ggk Tue Jun 27, 2006 01:54pm

interference???
 
R2, no outs. Line drive back at the pitcher that deflects off the pitcher’s knee and bounces over towards first base, near the foul line, but remains in fair territory. As the first-baseman is fielding the ball, the batter-runner runs over the defensive player. what is your ruling??

any difference between fed, ncaa and pro?? thx.

bob jenkins Tue Jun 27, 2006 02:03pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by ggk
R2, no outs. Line drive back at the pitcher that deflects off the pitcher’s knee and bounces over towards first base, near the foul line, but remains in fair territory. As the first-baseman is fielding the ball, the batter-runner runs over the defensive player. what is your ruling??

any difference between fed, ncaa and pro?? thx.

If F3 still had a play, then it's interference. Otherwise, it's obstruction.

UmpJM Tue Jun 27, 2006 02:04pm

ggk,

Under OBR and NCAA, if, in the judgment of the umpire, the F3 had a legitimate chance to obtain an out absent the interference, the BR is called out for interference, the ball is dead, any other runners return to their TOP base. If the F3 did NOT have a legitimate chance at an out, it is Obstruction (Type A), the ball is dead the BR awarded 1B and any other runners awarded the base they would have achieved absent the Obstruction.

Under FED, assuming no intent by either (& the runner could not have reasonably avoided the contact), it's a "train wreck", live ball, play the bounce.

JM

LMan Tue Jun 27, 2006 02:07pm

If the fielder is not "chasing" after the ball, ie, cleanly fielding a deflection from another player, he can be protected by the umpire from interference. J/R pg 99.

DG Tue Jun 27, 2006 10:36pm

"As the first-baseman is fielding the ball"

So it's interference. Let's read the line, not between the lines.

bob jenkins Wed Jun 28, 2006 08:45am

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoachJM
ggk,

Under FED, assuming no intent by either (& the runner could not have reasonably avoided the contact), it's a "train wreck", live ball, play the bounce.

JM

Coach --

Do you have a FED reference for this? I think the rule is the same in all codes.

UmpJM Wed Jun 28, 2006 09:16am

Bob,

I got that from the BRD (#317) referencing an Official FED Interpretation made by everyone's favorite FED interpreter. Struck me as a little odd, but no more so than some of the other FED interpretations.

JM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:34am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1