The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Baseball (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/)
-   -   Question (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/26838-question.html)

FutureUmp Thu Jun 01, 2006 10:01pm

Question
 
Two Balls Two Strikes, ball hits batter in left elbow. PU says its a ball because he "leaned in" to intentionally get struck. I called time and asked for a repeat fo the call and he said same thing. I asked how could he call "ball" when batter was struck (his call, intentional) and that i thought it should be a strike three, batter out. The batter ended up walking and costing us a run. What is the correct call for this if he intentionally leaned in to be struck?

Thanks for an answer for what seems like a no brainer but I cannot find a rule.

SanDiegoSteve Thu Jun 01, 2006 10:10pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by FutureUmp
Two Balls Two Strikes, ball hits batter in left elbow. PU says its a ball because he "leaned in" to intentionally get struck. I called time and asked for a repeat fo the call and he said same thing. I asked how could he call "ball" when batter was struck (his call, intentional) and that i thought it should be a strike three, batter out. The batter ended up walking and costing us a run. What is the correct call for this if he intentionally leaned in to be struck?

Thanks for an answer for what seems like a no brainer but I cannot find a rule.

If he leaned into the pitch intentionally, and it was in the strike zone, it would be strike three on a dead ball strike. If he intentionally leaned into a pitch that was not in the strike zone, it would be a ball, and the ball would be dead.

GarthB Thu Jun 01, 2006 10:13pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by FutureUmp
Two Balls Two Strikes, ball hits batter in left elbow. PU says its a ball because he "leaned in" to intentionally get struck. I called time and asked for a repeat fo the call and he said same thing. I asked how could he call "ball" when batter was struck (his call, intentional) and that i thought it should be a strike three, batter out. The batter ended up walking and costing us a run. What is the correct call for this if he intentionally leaned in to be struck?

Thanks for an answer for what seems like a no brainer but I cannot find a rule.

If the umpire ruled the batter "leaned" into the pitch, the ball is dead and he calls the pitch a ball or strike depending on the location as he would any other pitch. If it hit the batter's elbow he might have ruled that it was up, thus a ball, or it may have been in, thus a ball. He wouldn't call a strike unless the contact took place in the strike zone.

jwwashburn Thu Jun 01, 2006 10:54pm

Uhhhh, Steve, Garth...I think you were supposed to be mean to him, weren't you? Is that not the policy?:D :D

ozzy6900 Fri Jun 02, 2006 05:49am

Quote:

Originally Posted by jwwashburn
Uhhhh, Steve, Garth...I think you were supposed to be mean to him, weren't you? Is that not the policy?:D :D

You are absolutely jwwasburn!

Hey FutureUmp, what are you doing arguing balls & strikes? The PU called a ball so leave it at that! If you lost the game, it's because your team didn't get enough runs and that's not the PU's fault!

:D :D How's that jww?

jwwashburn Fri Jun 02, 2006 08:02am

Quote:

Originally Posted by ozzy6900
You are absolutely jwwasburn!

Hey FutureUmp, what are you doing arguing balls & strikes? The PU called a ball so leave it at that! If you lost the game, it's because your team didn't get enough runs and that's not the PU's fault!

:D :D How's that jww?

That's better!

johnnyg08 Fri Jun 02, 2006 08:44am

make sure you make the call firmly and sternly...because more than likely the offense will argue...especially if you call strike 3...make sure you stand by your call and "sell it".

FutureUmp Fri Jun 02, 2006 09:52pm

Although I am sure it was said in jest, I wasn't arguing balls and strikes (never would) but rather the correct call itself, I didn't want the batter to be able to lean into a strike and get away with strike three.

GarthB Fri Jun 02, 2006 09:57pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by FutureUmp
Although I am sure it was said in jest, I wasn't arguing balls and strikes (never would) but rather the correct call itself, I didn't want the batter to be able to lean into a strike and get away with strike three.


Well, if there are two strikes on him and he leans into a strike, he will get strike three. Why don't you want him to get strike three?

Saltydog Fri Jun 02, 2006 10:05pm

Look in the book - not yellow pages:-)
 
FutureUMP,

From 'the book' (OBR), Section 2 - Definition of Terms

"A STRIKE is a legal pitch when so called by the umpire, which-
(f) Touches the batter in flight in the strike zone"

SD

bobbybanaduck Fri Jun 02, 2006 11:28pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by FutureUmp
Two Balls Two Strikes, ball hits batter in left elbow. PU says its a ball because he "leaned in" to intentionally get struck. I called time and asked for a repeat fo the call and he said same thing. I asked how could he call "ball" when batter was struck (his call, intentional) and that i thought it should be a strike three, batter out. The batter ended up walking and costing us a run. What is the correct call for this if he intentionally leaned in to be struck?

Thanks for an answer for what seems like a no brainer but I cannot find a rule.

you called time??? i didn't know coaches had that ability in their job description. guess i learned something new today.

Saltydog Sat Jun 03, 2006 08:15am

See Rule 12.06.(c)(2)
 
As pointed out by CoachJM in another post, this is covered under

"Rule 12.06

(c)(2) During the course of the game ONLY COACHES are allowed to make up rules which have no foundation in the text, official interpretations, or history of the rules. APPROVED RULING: While the umpire may, at his sole discretion, entertain discussion of such made up rules with the coach (strictly for the entertaiment value), there will be NO ENFORCEMENT of any such rules."

:D

CJN Sat Jun 03, 2006 08:57am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saltydog
As pointed out by CoachJM in another post, this is covered under

"Rule 12.06

(c)(2) During the course of the game ONLY COACHES are allowed to make up rules which have no foundation in the text, official interpretations, or history of the rules. APPROVED RULING: While the umpire may, at his sole discretion, entertain discussion of such made up rules with the coach (strictly for the entertaiment value), there will be NO ENFORCEMENT of any such rules."

:D

No rules were made up by anyone in this sitch, so I don't think 12.06 applies. This sitch is really straightforward, if the pitch was a ball it's a ball, simple as that.
Nice try though.

Carbide Keyman Sat Jun 03, 2006 05:17pm

Hmmmmmmmmmm ........................
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by CJN
No rules were made up by anyone in this sitch, so I don't think 12.06 applies. This sitch is really straightforward, if the pitch was a ball it's a ball, simple as that.
Nice try though.

I see CJN had that humor bypass surgery. :D :D :D




Doug

TussAgee11 Sat Jun 03, 2006 05:29pm

I think 12.06 should be added to our list of abbreviations for sure. So much better to just say 12.06 then to get all upset over it and start a huge debate. Coach JM: good work. Now, I'll never say that again to a coach :D

FutureUmp Sun Jun 04, 2006 09:38pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobbybanaduck
you called time??? i didn't know coaches had that ability in their job description. guess i learned something new today.

Jeez umps are as egotistical as I have heard, I didn't call time, soory for the incorrect syntax, I ASKED for time and the umpie was gracious enough to give it to me.....better Bannarama?

DG Sun Jun 04, 2006 10:04pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by FutureUmp
Jeez umps are as egotistical as I have heard, I didn't call time, soory for the incorrect syntax, I ASKED for time and the umpire was gracious enough to give it to me.....better Bannarama?

It's kind of like the chirping from the coaches and the fans. If you can't stand the heat you will not be a good future ump.

bobbybanaduck Sun Jun 04, 2006 10:37pm

better? not really. the ball was dead when the batter got hit. time was already out. he wasn't gracious. he was probably laughing at you when you "called" time like i was when you wrote it in your post. and the ego comes with the territory. if i didn't have one, i'd get eaten alive by rats like you.

SanDiegoSteve Mon Jun 05, 2006 12:26am

Quote:

Originally Posted by FutureUmp
Jeez umps are as egotistical as I have heard, I didn't call time, soory for the incorrect syntax, I ASKED for time and the umpie was gracious enough to give it to me.....better Bannarama?

Ya damn Skippy we're egotistical. That's because we know like a thousand times more about baseball rules than the average rat. Rats who are knowledgable about baseball rules are a rare breed. We also don't like terms like "umpie" very much, so I don't suggest you use it in your next game.

We started off being nice to you, and it was jokingly suggested that we should have been meaner to you. So then ozzy jokingly got meaner and asked why you were arguing balls and strikes, all in good fun. Then Bobby reminded everyone that coaches can't call time. So what? We hear it all the time. Coaches will say, "hey, I called time out, Blue...didn't you hear me?" as if they actually believe that they can do this. That's what we thought you were talking about. I glad you know that rule, at least.:)

LMan Mon Jun 05, 2006 10:50am

Quote:

Originally Posted by FutureUmp
Jeez umps are as egotistical as I have heard, I didn't call time, soory for the incorrect syntax, I ASKED for time and the umpie was gracious enough to give it to me.....better Bannarama?


Bye, lil Skippy, nice reading ya ;)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:33pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1