FED pitching regs
Two quick points.
FED rules. Situation #1: Bases empty. From the wind-up position, the pitcher begins his delivery, catches his spikes on the rubber, stumbles, and fails to complete the delivery. Ruling? Situation #2: Bases empty. From the wind-up position, the pitcher accidentally drops the ball while in contact with the rubber. Ruling? Easy - I know. But I'm curious if there are any differences of opinion. David Emerling Memphis, TN |
Situation 1 - Did he release the ball?
Situation 2 - ball |
1. Nothing
2. Nothing |
Quote:
David Emerling Memphis, TN |
This thread is already heading in the direction I suspected it would go.
For Situation #1: <b>jumpmaster</b> seems to indicate his ruling would depend on whether the stumbling pitcher actually released the ball. <b>DG</b> says it's "nothing". <b>Tim C</b> says it's a "ball" awarded to the batter. For Situation #2: <b>jumpmaster</b> says "ball" <b>DG</b> says it's "nothing". <b>Tim C</b> says "ball" Interesting. Would the following statement be accurate with regards to FED pitching regulations? <b>Anything the pitcher does that would result in a balk with the bases occupied; would result in a "ball" awarded to the batter if there are no runners on base.</b> David Emerling Memphis, TN |
Yes, that is accurate IAW FED.
(crosses fingers) |
In the FED case book, if the pitcher drops the ball and it does not cross a foul line it is a no pitch. I don't have my books here but I'll find it when I get home.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:17pm. |