The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 20, 2006, 12:18pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 22
High School
One out, 2 strikes, runner on 1st. Pitch is outside to rh batter. He swings for strike 3 , the catcher makes contact on the throw to 2nd. It appears to be a deliberate action by the hitter to obstruct the throw to 2nd. The runner is safe. Obstruction is called. What grounds do I use for determining 2 outs on the play or sending the runner back to 1st? The rule book states in 7.3.5, Interferring with the catcher's fielding or throwing, the penalty is "If the pitch is a 3rd strike and in the umpire's judgement interference prevents a possible dp, 2 outs may be ruled".
Is it a situation that the runner would have been obviously out or ?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 20, 2006, 12:39pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 22
I misworded the title of my thread, it isn't base awards, it's offensive obstruction. Sorry
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 20, 2006, 12:55pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Greater Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 611
Send a message via Yahoo to umpduck11
Batter is out on strike three, and the
runner is out on his teammate's interference.
That would be two outs on the play.
__________________
All generalizations are bad. - R.H. Grenier
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 20, 2006, 01:20pm
goldcoastump
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
First, it is not obstruction, it is interference. If the BR interfers with the catcher on a throw down to a base you can have two outs.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 20, 2006, 01:21pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,019
Quote:
Originally posted by cards2323
High School


Is it a situation that the runner would have been obviously out
Yes.

Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 22, 2006, 10:18am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8
Smile

I believe, correct me if i'm wrong because I don't have my rule book with me, it is a delayed dead ball. If the the runner is safe on the play made by F2, the ball would be declared dead and the runner called out for the interference. If the runner is out on the play made by F2, the runner is out and according to FED rules, the interference is ignored(I HATE that word.) I use FED rules because that's what is used in OK.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 22, 2006, 10:42am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Bend, In.
Posts: 2,192
Send a message via AIM to BigUmp56 Send a message via Yahoo to BigUmp56
I don't understand what part of the two previous rules I showed you in your last thread that you don't get. I'll post them again.

8-4-2(g)

If, in the judgement of the umpire, a runner including the batter-runner interferes in any way and prevents a double play anywhere, two shall be declared out (the runner who interfered and the other runner involved).


6-3-5 Penalty

For infraction of article 5: When there are two outs, the batter is out. When there are not two outs and a runner is advancing to homeplate, if the runner is tagged out, the ball remains alive and the interference is ignored. Otherwise, the ball is dead and the runner is called out. When an attempt to put out a runner at any other base is unsuccessful, the batter is out and all runners must return to bases occupied at the time of the pitch.

Tim.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:04pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1