A handle full of guys have been arguing about this for a couple of days, on whether or not a bunt can be considered an infield fly. I say that a bunt CAN NOT be an infield fly. Can I get some input from the baseball community on this one?
|
Well,
You could buy a rule book and find the answer.
It is written very clearly. |
In Fed and OBR rules, a bunt should not be called an infield fly.
|
I do own a rule a rule book smartA@@. I states that a line drive and or an ATTEMPTED bunted ball is not. That is what I'm having trouble with.
|
Read the definition of "bunt"...
|
Quote:
|
with that definition of a bunt. I would come to conclude that an attempted bunt would be a ball hit in the air (infield fly) and therefor would not be included in the infield fly situation.
|
Now you've done . . .
"I do own a rule a rule book smartA@@."
Gosh darn I'm so offended. instead of saying buy a rule book I should have said: "Work on your reading skills!" Learning can be fun. |
Hey Tee can't believe some of the questions that have come up lately. The next one will be a debate about whether the hands are part of the bat.........LOL
|
So to answer my question, A bunt and or line drive can not be an infield fly rule.
|
Quote:
|
WADDA YA MEAN
C'mon now. You can line drive a bunt, but you can't bunt a line drive. Well you could but you'd be out.
|
To clarify. (1)A bunted ball off the bat by definiton posted earlier and a (2)swinging line drive off the bat, neither one are included in the infield fly situation.
|
Re: Now you've done . . .
Quote:
I disagree with my partner on this one. He claims each batter gets three strikes. I argue four. Whose correct? The rule book says three, but I am still unsure. Thanks. Yikes. Will this be a future post? |
Its summer ball time, anything is possible ;)
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:15pm. |