![]() |
TEX/TOR 7th inning play
|
The right ruling was made. The issue is whether it could be enforced given that time had been called.
|
TIME should have never been called, that was a live ball. They proved that when they awarded home to the runner. This is something we see in youth ball several times a year.
|
Quote:
8.02 (c ) If a decision is appealed, the umpire making the decision may ask another umpire for information before making a final decision. No umpire shall criticize, seek to reverse or interfere with another umpire’s decision unless asked to do so by the umpire making it. If the umpires consult after a play and change a call that had been made, then they have the authority to take all steps that they may deem necessary, in their discretion, to eliminate the results and consequences of the earlier call that they are reversing, including placing runners where they think those runners would have been after the play, had the ultimate call been made as the initial call, disregarding interference or obstruction that may have occurred on the play; failures of runners to tag up based upon the initial call on the field; runners passing other runners or missing bases; etc., all in the discretion of the umpires. No player, manager or coach shall be permitted to argue the exercise of the umpires’ discretion in resolving the play and any person so arguing shall be subject to ejection. |
The 7th inning play that I am more concerned with occurred in the bottom of the inning.
With the bases loaded and no outs. Ground ball to a drawn in F3 who threw to F2 for the force out at HP. The runner from 3B was out by the proverbial "country mile" and slide so far inside fair territory that he took out F2 before he had a chance to make a play on another runner. MTD, Sr. |
I didn't see the play, so I can't comment directly, but the rule at home is the same as the rule at second -- must be able to reach the base with a foot or hand (so the "sliding lane" is about 6' on each side at the base)
|
Quote:
|
The question to me on the slide into home is whether this type of play will be included in the Chase Utley rule that we all know is coming in the near future. I'm a Rangers fan, and I don't have a problem with the play as the slide was legal by the letter of the rule and it is how players for decades have been trained to play.
That said, I don't think we should have variable rules regarding sliding and avoidable contact depending on where the play is or whether it is a force or tag play, nor can the penalty be dependent on whether or not someone involved is injured. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
That's my point...it isn't that complicated right now. I would prefer it stay that way. We all know, however, that rule books are frequently flawed in any number of ways when written and/or amended. We deal with everything from poorly defined language, to bad formatting and illogical placement in the book. I'm not complaining or saying this issue prevents us from doing our jobs, but I hope they don't take this issue and make it more difficult to officiate.
I guess where I wasn't clear was that I'm looking at this proactively. I don't have any major issues with the existing rules. I just don't want people to overthink this and turn it into a mess. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:08pm. |