Quote:
Originally Posted by ajmc
Doesn't it really boil down to a judgment whether the foul (holding) was an actual, "attempt to conserve or consume time illegally", or just someone violating the blocking rules apart from any consideration about affecting timing.
|
Not as far as I'm concerned.....I'd say some of those in this thread agree with me.
When a foul obviously benefits the team committing the foul with respect to the clock, it's common practice to start on the snap.
A player commits a false start with a running game clock with 1 second on the play clock on 4th down with 24 seconds left in the game. Are there officials here who would even consider starting on the RFP?