View Single Post
  #92 (permalink)  
Old Mon Nov 09, 2015, 09:02am
SC Official SC Official is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,966
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef View Post
The case play cited had nothing to with Geof's confusion about a BC violation subsequent to a throw-in. Have you acknowledge that yet?
Correct. It has everything to do with Rut's blanket statement. And we are still here because Rut said that case play "did not go with the rules," and I responded. If it had nothing to do with Geof's confusion, then he never should have posted an erroneous opinion to further add to the confusion.

It's not that complicated.

Good day.
Reply With Quote