Wisconsin / Kentucky

blindzebra

Bigtime travel on the foul on the 3 pt shot at 15 seconds.

Adam

blindzebra wrote
Bigtime travel on the foul on the 3 pt shot at 15 seconds.

Big time? Not really.

bballref3966

blindzebra wrote
Bigtime travel on the foul on the 3 pt shot at 15 seconds.

Absolutely got away with one there.

canuckrefguy

Nevadaref wrote
No, the next one. Although I didn't care for the whistle on that strip either.

Good call. Dribbler had a clear path to the hoop. Defender moves into the dribbler with forearm to the chest, knocking him off his route and enabling the strip. Agree with y'all about the other couple, though.

blindzebra wrote
Bigtime travel on the foul on the 3 pt shot at 15 seconds.

Adam wrote
Big time? Not really.

Camron Rust

Nevadaref wrote
5:22 left #44 from Wisconsin gets hosed on a foul call.

He got beat, stepped and leaned sideways into the shooter. I thought that was an easy block call.

Camron Rust

Adam wrote
Big time? Not really.

I agree. It might have been there but I didn't see an obvious one.

Camron Rust

canuckrefguy wrote
Good call. Dribbler had a clear path to the hoop. Defender moves into the dribbler with forearm to the chest, knocking him off his route and enabling the strip. Agree with y'all about the other couple, though.

Agree. The strip never happens without the push.

Adam

Nevadaref wrote
Someone please explain to me what Pat Adams is seeing on these blocking calls.

Was he the one who called all three of those bad blocks against Jackson?

Raymond

blindzebra wrote
Bigtime travel on the foul on the 3 pt shot at 15 seconds.

Agree completely.

canuckrefguy

Good grief - that Harrison is money.

blindzebra

Adam wrote
Big time? Not really.

Two steps to his left that allowed him to A) release the ball and B) jump into the defender is absolutely a big time violation.

It used to be an automatic call everywhere but the NBA, sadly that is not the case anymore.

canuckrefguy

blindzebra wrote
Two steps to his left that allowed him to A) release the ball and B) jump into the defender is absolutely a big time violation.

It used to be an automatic call everywhere but the NBA, sadly that is not the case anymore.

Just watching the replay. Not seeing that at all. Here's the play-by-play off my PVR:

#12 receives pass and lands right foot - left foot (legal)
Dribbles once, picks up dribble, lands with right foot barely ahead of the left foot
Shot fakes - defender goes airborne (nothing)
Shooter moves right foot while jumping

I'm thinking official on the play gives #12 the two-foot jump stop off the dribble, and therefore no travel.

Technically, you could say travel - but it's a ticky-tack call on that kind of play.

Adam

canuckrefguy wrote
Just watching the replay. Not seeing that at all. Here's the play-by-play off my PVR:

#12 receives pass and lands right foot - left foot (legal)
Dribbles once, picks up dribble, lands with right foot barely ahead of the left foot
Shot fakes - defender goes airborne (nothing)
Shooter moves right foot while jumping

I'm thinking official on the play gives #12 the two-foot stop off the dribble, and therefore no travel.

Technically, you could say travel - but it's a ticky-tack call on that kind of play.

This is what I saw. It's not the sort of travel you're going to pick up when you're watching for impact you know is coming because you were watching the defender.

Camron Rust

Adam wrote
Was he the one who called all three of those bad blocks against Jackson?

Or the one against Lee when Kaminsky slammed into him?

There were a number of head-scratcher blocks on both sides.

just another ref

But, luckily we had a detailed, thorough, scientific analysis of the whole thing.

"I don't see how you can guard anybody in the post if they're not going to let you wrestle a little bit."

Rex Chapman

Nevadaref

canuckrefguy wrote
Good grief - that Harrison is money.

So that's how Kentucky recruited those twins. 😮

Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.

Nevadaref wrote
1. Little known NCAA rule permits the team to inbound either table side or opposite table following a technical foul, which is not POI.2. The very rare example of offensive GT just occurred, but was not called, at 16:35 of the 2nd half.
3. Crew was rather poor on block/charge decision in the first half. Two or three fouls called blocks which were PCs, imo.

In the "Ancient Days" the offended team had the choice of which Sideline at the Division Line to take the Throw-in for both boys'/girls' H.S. and men's/women's college. A number of years ago (no, I am not going to climb up into the attic, LOL!), the NFHS changed the rule to put the ball in play at the Division Line opposite the Table. But the NCAA did not adopt the change.

MTD, Sr.

Nevadaref

Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. wrote
In the "Ancient Days" the offended team had the choice of which Sideline at the Division Line to take the Throw-in for both boys'/girls' H.S. and men's/women's college. A number of years ago (no, I am not going to climb up into the attic, LOL!), the NFHS changed the rule to put the ball in play at the Division Line opposite the Table. But the NCAA did not adopt the change.

MTD, Sr.

And now all the youngin's have the rest of the story!
Thanks for the post. 🙂

Camron Rust

bballref3966 wrote
Close goaltending no-call at 16:36 in second half. Would love to get another look at it. Was on its downward flight, appeared to be above the ring, but not sure it had the possibility of entering the basket.

I thought it was a good call. Unless it is grossly off (it wasn't), I don't think any official would rule that it has no chance of going in.

EDIT: My comments were about the other GT was called.

[deleted]

Camron Rust wrote
Or the one against Lee when Kaminsky slammed into him?

There were a number of head-scratcher blocks on both sides.

He was just being consistent with the blocking calls they made earlier. I knew it was gonna be called a block as soon as I heard the whistle.

« Previous Page Next Page »