bballref3966 Yep, nothing illegal. At first glance I thought his stance was too wide on #1, just wanted to see our thoughts. Thanks for the video.
Rob1968 bballref3966 wroteYep, nothing illegal. At first glance I thought his stance was too wide on #1, just wanted to see our thoughts. Thanks for the video. My understanding is, that if the stance is wide, but the contact is on the torso, the width of the feet/legs is of no consequence.
Camron Rust Travel? :eek:😉 Seriously, though...the screens are both legal and legal by a long shot.
twocentsworth bballref3966 wroteTwo borderline screens by ND in final minute of game that went uncalled. Video would be appreciated. I thought at first glance that the first screen should've been a team control foul and the second one (near division line) was a good no-call. Neither screen comes close to being borderline/illegal in any way, shape, or form.
bballref3966 twocentsworth wroteNeither screen comes close to being borderline/illegal in any way, shape, or form. I apologize that my lapse in judgment watching TV made you so defensive.
JugglingReferee Not even close to a foul call in either case. In fact, the screener in each case, Blue 25, made it easier for the defender to get back into the play via his post-contact movement.
Multiple Sports Since it is obvious there is nothing here can we close this thread and fine the originator of the OP ?????
Adam Multiple Sports wroteSince it is obvious there is nothing here can we close this thread and fine the originator of the OP ????? Not even close to being a useless thread, but feel free to call for a code red.