This one is wacky! Over and back?!

Adam

Mark Padgett wrote
Not a travel? :confused:

Why would it be?

Mark Padgett

Adam wrote
Why would it be?

Because his team was down by 2 with only a few seconds to go. 🙄

Adam

Mark Padgett wrote
Because his team was down by 2 with only a few seconds to go. :rolleyes:

Sorry I asked.

BktBallRef

I can't think of a situation where "the imaginary plane" of the division line would ever come into play. Is there even such a thing?

APG

BktBallRef wrote
I can't think of a situation where "the imaginary plane" of the division line would ever come into play. Is there even such a thing?

Two situations under NBA rules:

Timeout request from an airborne player that breaks the midcourt plane.

Also, the ball is considered in the frontcourt when the ball breaks the plane of the midcourt line when not in player control

bob jenkins

BktBallRef wrote
I can't think of a situation where "the imaginary plane" of the division line would ever come into play. Is there even such a thing?

Airborne TO request in NCAA.

BktBallRef

DISCLAIMER: Unless otherwise stated, all Bktballref posts refer to NFHS rules.

[deleted]

BktBallRef wrote
DISCLAIMER: Unless otherwise stated, all Bktballref posts refer to NFHS rules.

Looks like you found a new signature!

BktBallRef

seanwestref wrote
Looks like you found a new signature!

Not new, had it before.

Unfortunately, I currently have to concern myself with my Constitutional right being taken away from me.

maven

BktBallRef wrote
Not new, had it before.

Unfortunately, I currently have to concern myself with my Constitutional right being taken away from me.

Constitutional rights cannot be taken away. They can be infringed, or the Constitution can be amended so that they are no longer rights.

HawkeyeCubP

bob jenkins wrote
Airborne TO request in NCAA.

Not to pick nits, but to commence nitpicking: The NCAA rule and corresponding cases actually only mention momentum carrying into the BC or OB - no mentioning of the vertical planes separating areas. (In case anyone were to want to explain a call, no-call, or rule to an inquiring coach.)

mplagrow

Welpe wrote
Depends if he established a pivot cheek or not.

Wow, I remember that thread...that was some time ago! I hope that article isn't still out there somewhere!

BktBallRef

maven wrote
Constitutional rights cannot be taken away. They can be infringed, or the Constitution can be amended so that they are no longer rights.

Play all the semantics you want, I couldn't care less. I think most everyone else here knows what I was talking about.