just another ref AllPurposeGamer wroteI have a block on both of them. Also in the second clip, the center did a great job of holding his preliminary (you can see he had a foul call if you view the camera from the endline). Two good examples of at least one official withholding his preliminary. No blarges here (and no JAR going on a one man crusades...we're all winners 😉). Where is it written that any preliminary signal necessitates any call? You brought it up.
APG just another ref wroteWhere is it written that any preliminary signal necessitates any call? You brought it up. Instead of going on your one-man, never-going-to-win-it crusade, let's get your opinion on the plays posted in here. 😀
just another ref Both blocks looked like good calls to me. Where I work, the shot in the head is a foul.
APG just another ref wroteBoth blocks looked like good calls to me. Where I work, the shot in the head is a foul. What about the illegal screen? This play seems to be *50/50 or maybe *65/35 illegal screen to no call. *Very scientifically determined.
just another ref AllPurposeGamer wroteWhat about the illegal screen? This play seems to be *50/50 or maybe *65/35 illegal screen to no call. *Very scientifically determined. Looks like the right call to me. Also looks like it would have been easy to miss live.
APG Was asked to get this clip and get the forum's response to the call in the chat room yesterday. Agree/disagree?
just another ref I think he traveled twice, the second of which was simultaneous with committing a player control foul.
Drizzle AllPurposeGamer wroteWas asked to get this clip and get the forum's response to the call in the chat room yesterday. Agree/disagree? Disagree. I see B1 establishing LGP and beating A1 to the spot during the turn, and A1's shoulder crashing into the B1's body. PC Foul.
APG BillyMac wroteEasy call: Travel. Disregard if he traveled or not...what is your call on the block/charge call.
BillyMac AllPurposeGamer wroteDisregard if he traveled or not. What is your call on the block/charge call. That will cost you extra.
tref I thought the defender established & maintained LGP & the offense went to & through, but the calling official obviously, really liked his call 😀
APG This play is being referenced in another thread. Run of the mill shooting foul or upgrade to an intentional?
Adam Wow, after seeing the play, it's an easy int in my games. Of course, I recognize that Rut's area probably has a different effing standard for this play. But he doesn't even pretend to try to get the ball when he grabs the waist.
Raymond BillyMac wroteEasy call: Travel. Vernon Macklin's And 1: Definitely travelled first. And I don't think the defender did any illegal to earn a blocking call though I do think he flopped, but his flop didn't affect the shooter.
APG BadNewsRef wroteVernon Macklin's And 1: Definitely travelled first. And I don't think the defender did any illegal to earn a blocking call though I do think he flopped, but his flop didn't affect the shooter. While I think the defender in question embellished the contact some, I believe there's definitely enough contact that you have to put air in the whistle.
Raymond AllPurposeGamer wroteThis play is being referenced in another thread. YouTube - Possible Intentional Foul? Run of the mill shooting foul or upgrade to an intentional? Not as obvious an intentional foul as I was expecting based on all the chatter here. Have no problem if they had come together and gone with IF but seeing the play at normal speed the first time I thought the player initially made a play on the ball. Further scrutiny leads to going IF but I can understand how the officials didn't go with an IF at the moment.
Camron Rust I have no idea who's idea it was to lump all discussions about the games into one thread but it is a horrible idea. It is nearly impossible to tell which comments go with which play at this point.
