Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells
I'm still curious as to which reasoning you think the committee had when writing this case play.
1. Was it written for the beligerent a$$es who won't concede to one another.
2. Was it written for the odd case where both officials report their respective fouls without knowing about the other?
|
I mentioned my theory - the committee wants to make correcting an official's screw-up onerous enough that officials will be less likely to do it again.