Quote:
Originally posted by bob jenkins
Quote:
Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
Quote:
Originally posted by Nevadaref
Quote:
Originally posted by MichiganOfficial
Way to go Jurassic, Yes it is an Intentional Personal Foul
|
Oh yeah? How do you KNOW for sure? Do you have something from the NFHS?
|
Oh yeah? How do you know for sure it isn't an intentional foul? Do you have something from the NFHS?
The description given fits the criteria of both foul definitions(personal foul and intentional personal foul), Nevada, as I already posted. It now becomes a judgment call. If you think that it should be a personal foul, fine. That's your opinion. Is there any reason that you now can't respect the right of another official to have a differing opinion?
|
I can't speak for NevadaRef, but if Michigan Ref is going ot post this play and present a definitive (i.e., fact-based) answer, then I, too, would like to see a reference. If it's just his opinion that it's an IP foul, then I would appreciate that comment as well.
|
Hey now, I do give respect to the differing OPINION. I agree with JR that it is a judgment call. I even wrote that JugRef's post had merit, I just didn't agree with his conclusion.
However, as Bob said, I am certainly questioning MichOfficial's definitive answer to his "quiz" question. While I only have my opinion on reading of the rules to back my ruling, I wish to know what he has that makes him 100% right. If he's going to come onto this forum and tell us that something is a certain way, then he better be prepared to back up his statement.
That's all.