ThickSkin My answer key tells me that 22 is no and cites 4.12.1 and 9.9.1. For 38 It says Yes and cites 3.3.1e
MikeMel My answer key tells me that 22 is no and cites 4.12.1 and 9.9.1. For 38 It says Yes and cites 3.3.1e Those cites make no sense to the question referred to in the original post. We're talking about the IAABO Refresher test here. There seem to be two different tests. Most of the questions on this board are about the FED test not the IAABO test. Mike
BayStateRef Originally posted by ThickSkin My answer key tells me that 22 is no and cites 4.12.1 and 9.9.1. For 38 It says Yes and cites 3.3.1e Not sure what "key" you are using, but those cites do not match up with the questions. Ref18 posted the correct answers from the correct key.
ThickSkin From the actual IAABO test. 2005-06. I didn't see in the original post if these questions were from the refresher exam. my apologies. [Edited by ThickSkin on Nov 17th, 2005 at 04:43 PM]
ref18 Originally posted by ThickSkin From the actual IAABO test. 2005-06. I didn't see in the original post if these questions were from the refresher exam. my apologies. [Edited by ThickSkin on Nov 17th, 2005 at 04:43 PM] Dude, check your e-mail.
som44 My IAABo test #38 says the official continues the count when player A2 slides or passes between A1 and B1 but does not stop--that is why #38 is yes--check your question again
jdccpa 22. A-1 is holding the ball in the frontcourt & closely guarded by B-1. As the official count is at 2, A-2 takes & holds a position between A-1 and B-1. Official stops the count. Correct? The answer is NO! See CB 9.10.1 Situation D
ref18 Originally posted by jdccpa 22. A-1 is holding the ball in the frontcourt & closely guarded by B-1. As the official count is at 2, A-2 takes & holds a position between A-1 and B-1. Official stops the count. Correct? The answer is NO! See CB 9.10.1 Situation D According to the IAABO Answer Key, the answer is yes. See 4-10, 4-23-1
jdccpa Let me get this straight. So any time another offensive player takes a position in front of a closely guarded teammate I should discontinue the 5 sec count? The answer sheet be damned I going to continue counting.
ref18 The answer sheet makes sense. If another offensive player gets in between, then you've got the defender with LGP on the new offensive player. You can't have guarding position on 2 players at once.
Camron Rust Originally posted by ref18 The answer sheet makes sense. If another offensive player gets in between, then you've got the defender with LGP on the new offensive player. You can't have guarding position on 2 players at once. Why not? (Rules reference??)
rainmaker Originally posted by ref18 The answer sheet makes sense. If another offensive player gets in between, then you've got the defender with LGP on the new offensive player. You can't have guarding position on 2 players at once. rules references?
Camron Rust Originally posted by ref18 The answer sheet makes sense. If another offensive player gets in between, then you've got the defender with LGP on the new offensive player. You can't have guarding position on 2 players at once. Why not? (Rules reference??) If it did say so, where does it say which one is the one being guarded.?
jdccpa The case book example (9.10.1 Situation D (b)) has four players surrounding the dribbler and it says that this is a closely guarded situation. I'm still counting!