WARNING! Off-topic! Do NOT read if you are at all offended by baseball threads!!

ChuckElias

"namesake n. a person having the same name as another" (The New Lexicon Webster's Dictionary of the English Language, Encylopedic Edition, 1989)

"one that has the same name as another; especially : one who is named after another or for whom another is named" (www.m-w.com).

Being a namesake doesn't imply that a person is named after another. It can mean that they simply share a name. Or it can mean that the other person was named for the original person.

mick

Originally posted by Jurassic Referee

Originally posted by Dan_ref

Celebrity, a tribute to Berra's unique status in American culture, showcases Yogi figurines, comic books, cereal boxes, magazine covers, and even Berra's cartoon namesake, Yogi Bear.

[/B]

Aaaaargh. Wrong, wrong,wrong.....

The cartoon Yogi didn't come along for at least 10-12 years after Berra got his nickname. A friend of Larry Berra saw a movie that had an Indian snake charmer- also called a yogi- in it. He said that the snake charmer walked just like his buddy, Larry, and he started calling Larry- Yogi. It caught on and he was Yogi Berra ever since. When Yogi Bear came along, the rumor was that Yogi Berra was actually his namesake. Iow, t'was the other way around. [/B][/QUOTE]

I always thought that Lawrence practiced "yoga".
mick

Jurassic Referee

Originally posted by ChuckElias
"namesake n. a person having the same name as another" (The New Lexicon Webster's Dictionary of the English Language, Encylopedic Edition, 1989)

or

"one that has the same name as another; especially : one who is named after another or for whom another is named" (www.m-w.com).

Being a namesake doesn't imply that a person is named after another. It can mean that they simply share a name. Or it can mean that the other person was named for the original person.

Thanks for the info, Dick.

Dan_ref

Originally posted by Jurassic Referee

Originally posted by ChuckElias
"namesake n. a person having the same name as another" (The New Lexicon Webster's Dictionary of the English Language, Encylopedic Edition, 1989)

or

"one that has the same name as another; especially : one who is named after another or for whom another is named" (www.m-w.com).

Being a namesake doesn't imply that a person is named after another. It can mean that they simply share a name. Or it can mean that the other person was named for the original person.
Thanks for the info, Dick.

Dick? His name is Ch....ooooooooohhhhh, hold on here....I get it! I like that, very subtle!

ChuckElias

Originally posted by Dan_ref
I get it! I like that, very subtle!

About as subtle as blowing a 3-0 lead in a playoff series. I was just trying to help, and see what I get.

Just out of curiosity, how is the ALCS loss being portrayed in the NY media? I heard a national radio talk show host (FOX radio) describe it as the biggest choke job of all time. Is the NY media being that hard on the Yankees? Are they sloughing it off as a lucky statistical anomoly?

Personally, I think that calling it a huge choke job denigrates the effort of the Red Sox. But obviously, I have a huge bias.

Dan_ref

Originally posted by ChuckElias

Originally posted by Dan_ref
I get it! I like that, very subtle!

About as subtle as blowing a 3-0 lead in a playoff series. I was just trying to help, and see what I get.

Just out of curiosity, how is the ALCS loss being portrayed in the NY media? I heard a national radio talk show host (FOX radio) describe it as the biggest choke job of all time. Is the NY media being that hard on the Yankees? Are they sloughing it off as a lucky statistical anomoly?

Personally, I think that calling it a huge choke job denigrates the effort of the Red Sox. But obviously, I have a huge bias.

Yeah, the NY media is so insulated from the outside world I can see how you might be confused on their current thinking, Dick.

BTW, the NY media is having a hard time getting news from the outside...did the local police celebrate by killing any more college students up your way? Or was that a once in 2 lifetimes type thing as well?

Jurassic Referee

Originally posted by ChuckElias
[/B]

[/B][/QUOTE]From what I've read, the general feeling in NY seems to be that Boston was a completely worthy winner- which was my feeling also. It was more a matter of the BoSox SLIGHTLY outplaying the Yankees than the Yankees choking. The real choking dog was the Professor in St. Louis, as usual. LaRussa is just a whining little turkey, imo. Genius? Bah! Most newspapers around the country seemed to agree with that also. There was a good story by Harvey Araton in the NY Times this morning that seemed to better sum up how most NY fans feel about Boston winning. I'll dig up a link and post it.

Jurassic Referee

Originally posted by Jurassic Referee

Originally posted by ChuckElias

Just out of curiosity, how is the ALCS loss being portrayed in the NY media? I heard a national radio talk show host (FOX radio) describe it as the biggest choke job of all time. Is the NY media being that hard on the Yankees? Are they sloughing it off as a lucky statistical anomoly?

[/B]

There was a good story by Harvey Araton in the NY Times this morning that seemed to better sum up how most NY fans feel about Boston winning. I'll dig up a link and post it. [/B][/QUOTE]You may need to log in to read this- but it's a good story.

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/28/sports/baseball/28araton.html?oref=login

ChuckElias

Originally posted by Dan_ref
Yeah, the NY media is so insulated from the outside world I can see how you might be confused on their current thinking, Dick.

Believe it or not, we've been a little too busy up here hugging everybody we know to run out and get hooked up with Direct TV, just so we can watch Mike and the Mad Dog. And since the Post and Daily News don't get delivered to my door, I thought maybe somebody a little closer to the Bronx might have a better feel for the current mood than I do.

did the local police celebrate by killing any more college students up your way?

Maybe you're a little grumpier than usual b/c of recent events in the Stadium, but that's not really a joking subject. It was an accident and a tragedy, especially b/c it resulted from a "non-lethal" instrument.

ChuckElias

Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
It was more a matter of the BoSox SLIGHTLY outplaying the Yankees than the Yankees choking.

I would agree with that

The real choking dog was the Professor in St. Louis, as usual.

I would agree with that, too. They just didn't even show up. You wonder how they won 105 games with those pitchers.

Jurassic Referee

Originally posted by ChuckElias

Originally posted by Dan_ref
And since the Post and Daily News don't get delivered to my door, I thought maybe somebody a little closer to the Bronx might have a better feel for the current mood than I do.

Lah me, Chuckie, the internet is a wonderful thing:

http://www.nypost.com/sports/sports.shtml

http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/index.html

Bookmark 'em. NY Times is on line too- papers from Detroit, Boston, Chicago, LA, Houghton, Springfield- all the major centers.

Howinthell did you think that I found out about the latest find on one of your ancestors- Flores Man?

rainmaker

Originally posted by ChuckElias
"one that has the same name as another; especially : one who is named after another or for whom another is named" (www.m-w.com).

Being a namesake doesn't imply that a person is named after another. It can mean that they simply share a name. Or it can mean that the other person was named for the original person.

As long as we're wandering off topic, here's a sort of joke.

Kid to friend: I was named after Horatio Alger.

Friend: How do you figure? You're name is Johnny!

Kid: Well I sure wasn't named before him!

Ha... ha... ha...

Dan_ref

Originally posted by ChuckElias

Originally posted by Dan_ref
Yeah, the NY media is so insulated from the outside world I can see how you might be confused on their current thinking, Dick.

Believe it or not, we've been a little too busy up here hugging everybody we know to run out and get hooked up with Direct TV, just so we can watch Mike and the Mad Dog. And since the Post and Daily News don't get delivered to my door, I thought maybe somebody a little closer to the Bronx might have a better feel for the current mood than I do.

As JR already mentioned, there's this cool thing called the internet. Check it out. Which leaves the question begging an answer: if you're too busy hugging each other to get your direct tv how do you know Mike & the Mad Dog appear on TV?

did the local police celebrate by killing any more college students up your way?

I'll take that as a yes, it is just another once in 2 lifetimes events that shock us.

Dan_ref

Originally posted by Jurassic Referee

Originally posted by ChuckElias

Originally posted by Dan_ref
And since the Post and Daily News don't get delivered to my door, I thought maybe somebody a little closer to the Bronx might have a better feel for the current mood than I do.

Lah me, Chuckie, the internet is a wonderful thing:

http://www.nypost.com/sports/sports.shtml

http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/index.html

Bookmark 'em. NY Times is on line too- papers from Detroit, Boston, Chicago, LA, Houghton, Springfield- all the major centers.

Howinthell did you think that I found out about the latest find on one of your ancestors- Flores Man?

Geeze JR, just what in the world could you be talking about here? Please, oh please please please tell us ...what is this Flores Man you speak of????

Happy Birthday Woody!

Jurassic Referee

Originally posted by Dan_ref

Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
Howinthell did you think that I found out about the latest find on one of your ancestors- Flores Man?
[/b]

Geeze JR, just what in the world could you be talking about here? Please, oh please please please tell us ...what is this Flores Man you speak of????

[/B]

You mean Chuck didn't tell you about the big news that he just got on his ancestors?

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4127713

And I thought you were kidding when you told me that he was a Hobbit. Who woulda thunk it?

Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.

Originally posted by rainmaker

Originally posted by ChuckElias
"one that has the same name as another; especially : one who is named after another or for whom another is named" (www.m-w.com).

Being a namesake doesn't imply that a person is named after another. It can mean that they simply share a name. Or it can mean that the other person was named for the original person.

As long as we're wandering off topic, here's a sort of joke.

Kid to friend: I was named after Horatio Alger.

Friend: How do you figure? You're name is Johnny!

Kid: Well I sure wasn't named before him!

Ha... ha... ha...

"Wandering off topic." Surely you jest?

Jurassic Referee

This just in. The Boston Red Sox lost their championship parade today in the bottom of the ninth when a duck boat driven by Manny Ramirez went through Bill Buckner's legs.

Details to follow.....

Film at 11.....

ChuckElias

The parade was a tremendous success today. I watched some of it from home before my scrimmage. Looked like everyone had a great time. My partner got a call from his buddy who was there. The sounded like he was having the best time of his life. Pretty funny. And even if you don't like the Red Sox or parades, a woman jumped into the Charles River naked. So there was something for everyone.

Now that there are no more games, here's a trivia question for the Yankee fans out there. Who is the only Yankee player to wear both uniform #3 and uniform #7 during his career?

Dan_ref

Originally posted by ChuckElias
The parade was a tremendous success today. I watched some of it from home before my scrimmage. Looked like everyone had a great time. My partner got a call from his buddy who was there. The sounded like he was having the best time of his life. Pretty funny. And even if you don't like the Red Sox or parades, a woman jumped into the Charles River naked. So there was something for everyone.

Now that there are no more games, here's a trivia question for the Yankee fans out there. Who is the only Yankee player to wear both uniform #3 and uniform #7 during his career?

Wow. Great question, give me a little time to dig up the answer. Whoever it was had to be on the team between '35 & '48 I think. In the meantime, enjoy this picture I stumbled upon:

ChuckElias

So. . . give up?

« Previous Page Next Page »