|
Bob Lyle...you're number 1! Guess which finger?
Carl,
From your post about the tossed glove.
"The look on my face is not smug, just satisfied."
I believe I said that I didn't want to waste the time looking it up and used the word "smirk" instead of "smug". I have now done so; mea culpa for paraphrasing you (which I said I was doing anyway). If you consider that an aggregious inaccuracy, I would love to watch you work some day. I am positive that I could find bigger problems. Don't pretend that my post was anything more than pulling back thecurtain on your charade. The "Wizard" claimed that he has not shared his opinion on Hopkins' ruling. I showed how you did. I asked you to comment on the two plays that I provided. Both are excellent examples of how the FED rule will be bogus. You did not, because you could not argue with the logic.
Among the many difference betwixt us, is that I recognize that you can and have been right with your opinions. You have also been wrong. I believe that JJ, Garth and Jim have pointed out your foibles, as well. Yet, you say that my post was filled with errors. As an example, you found fault with my contention that the Fed Rules Committee justifies their existence with annual rule changes and updates. Papa C. says, "Yeah, but not every rule is changed every year, Hah!" (I put words in your mouth, just as you quoted me with a fake one in an earlier retort. At least I acknowledge as much.) I never said that every rule gets reversed; but each year we see new, altered and emphasized rulings that mystify many of us. You claim that we don't READ your posts. Try extending us the same courtesy. Answer the question I posed earlier and show the world how Papa C. would handle it. Do not change the situation or offer possibilities.
|