Forum: Softball
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 12:05pm
|
Replies: 26
Views: 2,554
Well, let's not be too inclusive in that...
Well, let's not be too inclusive in that statement. If you "know" a fielder is throwing AT the runner, not a team mate, and the runner reaches up to defend themselves you have "intent" on both...
|
Forum: Softball
Mon Sep 15, 2014, 07:02pm
|
Replies: 26
Views: 2,554
Unless there is something else contradicting...
Unless there is something else contradicting this, "intent" is required with a thrown ball:
12.8.5 When she interferes with a fielder attempting to field a batted ball,
interferes with a...
|
Forum: Softball
Sun Sep 14, 2014, 03:31pm
|
Replies: 26
Views: 2,554
You are correct, and IMO, both calls were...
You are correct, and IMO, both calls were absolutely terrible and actually gives the defense a reason to go head-hunting. And let me know when you can find a rule to support those calls.
|
Forum: Softball
Tue Sep 09, 2014, 12:01pm
|
Replies: 26
Views: 2,554
No, but the point is if they move from that...
No, but the point is if they move from that position, there is little doubt that could be an act of INT. Much like the RHB is told by the coach to NOT move if the runner is attempting to steal as...
|
Forum: Softball
Mon Sep 08, 2014, 09:51pm
|
Replies: 26
Views: 2,554
Just standing there is not an act of INT and I...
Just standing there is not an act of INT and I believe that is what Steve was stating. "Doing what they are supposed to do" or "cannot go poof" are reasons why it is not an act of INT, not why it...
|
Forum: Softball
Mon Sep 08, 2014, 06:57am
|
Replies: 26
Views: 2,554
|
Forum: Softball
Sun Sep 07, 2014, 05:51pm
|
Replies: 26
Views: 2,554
|