Are Jersey/shorts/hair considered part of body?

[potato]

Say the ball breezes past a player's jersey/pants, or even hair and goes out of bounds, does consider out of bounds for that player's team?

for example the ball didn't touch the player's body but shorts.

Originally Posted by potato

Say the ball breezes past a player's jersey/pants, or even hair and goes out of bounds, does consider out of bounds for that player's team?

for example the ball didn't touch the player's body but shorts.

Yes. Here (situation 9) is a past interpretation of a player being called OOB by her hair.

[potato]

Originally Posted by AremRed

Yes. Here (situation 9) is a past interpretation of a player being called OOB by her hair.

i understand hair is actually part of the body, what about jersey & shorts or even shoe lace?

Originally Posted by potato

i understand hair is actually part of the body, what about jersey & shorts or even shoe lace?

Yes.

[just another ref]

If it is attached to your person, you are responsible for it.

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by potato

Say the ball breezes past a player's jersey/pants, or even hair and goes out of bounds, does consider out of bounds for that player's team?

for example the ball didn't touch the player's body but shorts.

If an opponent grabs the shorts or jersey of a player, but doesn't physically touch his body, would you call a foul?

[potato]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

If an opponent grabs the shorts or jersey of a player, but doesn't physically touch his body, would you call a foul?

would it be a foul if a player stretches his pants to stop an opposing player like a Torero with his red cape?

also would the person have ball control if he uses his jersey to catch the ball?

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by potato

would it be a foul if a player stretches his pants to stop an opposing player like a Torero with his red cape?

also would the person have ball control if he uses his jersey to catch the ball?

Do you live in either Colorado or Washington state?

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by potato

would it be a foul if a player stretches his pants to stop an opposing player like a Torero with his red cape?

also would the person have ball control if he uses his jersey to catch the ball?

How would you interpret 2-3 (NFHS and NCAA), or the FIBA equivalent as it applies to these plays?

[APG]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

Do you live in either Colorado or Washington state?

Or Washington D.C....or Alaska...or Oregon

Potato, anything on a person's body (jersey, shorts, etc.) is considered part of the body

[justacoach]

I am certain his affliction is due to chronic exposure to something much more potent...

[Adam]

Originally Posted by potato

would it be a foul if a player stretches his pants to stop an opposing player like a Torero with his red cape?

also would the person have ball control if he uses his jersey to catch the ball?

Seriously. I know it's a holiday, but stop. Just stop.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

Do you live in either Colorado or Washington state?

Have you ever looked at your hand? I mean really looked at your hand?

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by Adam

Have you ever looked at your hand? I mean really looked at your hand?

But I could not say, "Pass the dutchie?"

Peace

[Welpe]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

But I could not say, "Pass the dutchie?"

Peace

According to whom? Your post is still there. You didn't forget to pass the dutchie did you?