Final piece of the puzzle

[just another ref]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

Yes it does. Why do you think you get to speak for all officials and what they are interpreting?

I'm not speaking for anybody. I'm voicing an opinion. Apparently the official in Nevadaref's play had the same opinion.

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by just another ref

I'm not speaking for anybody. I'm voicing an opinion. Apparently the official in Nevadaref's play had the same opinion.

"Who did or didn't make a preliminary block/charge signal has nothing to do with it."

Well, I'm telling that it does matter in every signal game I've ever worked unless I'm working a summer league or AAU tournament that has NCAA-Women's rules.

Even when I work games with officials who normall work NCAA-Women's basketball, they know that unless we are working NCAA-W's rules, that preliminary signals determine whether or not we have to report a blarge.

Of course, NCAA-Women's officials already know that preliminary signals equal ruling/calling, because it explicitly says so in their rule set.

[JRutledge]

BTW, there was a play in one of the State Finals where one official gave a block and the other signaled a charge. Well the State Rules Interpreter pointed out they did not go with a double foul when I had a conversation with him about that weekend. So it appears that he was not happy with the fact they ignored what the other official's signal was given.

Peace

[just another ref]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

No one around here is questioning the casebook that is already written. And once again, you do not live in our state and we are not having this debate ANYWHERE!!!!

Peace

Originally Posted by JRutledge

BTW, there was a play in one of the State Finals where one official gave a block and the other signaled a charge. Well the State Rules Interpreter pointed out they did not go with a double foul when I had a conversation with him about that weekend.

What state was this? Sounds like a debate to me.

[Raymond]

Really, do you always have to be so disingenuous?

[just another ref]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

Really, do you always have to be so disingenuous?

You may think I'm doing it again, but you're going to have to explain what you mean by that.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by just another ref

What state was this? Sounds like a debate to me.

Yes you are being disingenuous. Actually that is the nice way to put it.

Peace