The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sun Dec 21, 2003, 10:41pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 4
In a 6th grade tournament I recently reffed, a girl was wearing volleyball style knee pads. NFHS rule 3-5 states that "knee and ankle BRACES are allowed.." I allowed the knee pads because they created no advantage/disadvantage and the girl was 6'1 53 pounds and probably needed them. How do you interpret the rule?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sun Dec 21, 2003, 11:33pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 744
Legal.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sun Dec 21, 2003, 11:52pm
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Toledo, Ohio, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,047
Quote:
Originally posted by coach/ref
In a 6th grade tournament I recently reffed, a girl was wearing volleyball style knee pads. NFHS rule 3-5 states that "knee and ankle BRACES are allowed.." I allowed the knee pads because they created no advantage/disadvantage and the girl was 6'1 53 pounds and probably needed them. How do you interpret the rule?

I do not think that R3-S5 has anything to do with knee pads. All one has to do is look at pictures of some of the earliest teams to play the game and one will see that everybody wore knee pads.
__________________
Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Trumbull Co. (Warren, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn.
Wood Co. (Bowling Green, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn.
Ohio Assn. of Basketball Officials
International Assn. of Approved Bkb. Officials
Ohio High School Athletic Association
Toledo, Ohio
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 22, 2003, 01:44am
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Houghton, U.P., Michigan
Posts: 9,953
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Quote:
Originally posted by coach/ref
In a 6th grade tournament I recently reffed, a girl was wearing volleyball style knee pads. NFHS rule 3-5 states that "knee and ankle BRACES are allowed.." I allowed the knee pads because they created no advantage/disadvantage and the girl was 6'1 53 pounds and probably needed them. How do you interpret the rule?

I do not think that R3-S5 has anything to do with knee pads. All one has to do is look at pictures of some of the earliest teams to play the game and one will see that everybody wore knee pads.
I wore knee pads only in the 7th grade. 1960. 43 years ago.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 22, 2003, 01:50am
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Toledo, Ohio, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,047
Quote:
Originally posted by mick
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Quote:
Originally posted by coach/ref
In a 6th grade tournament I recently reffed, a girl was wearing volleyball style knee pads. NFHS rule 3-5 states that "knee and ankle BRACES are allowed.." I allowed the knee pads because they created no advantage/disadvantage and the girl was 6'1 53 pounds and probably needed them. How do you interpret the rule?

I do not think that R3-S5 has anything to do with knee pads. All one has to do is look at pictures of some of the earliest teams to play the game and one will see that everybody wore knee pads.
I wore knee pads only in the 7th grade. 1960. 43 years ago.

And I thought you were telling everybody that the girls loved your cute knees, why would you hide them behind knee pads.
__________________
Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Trumbull Co. (Warren, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn.
Wood Co. (Bowling Green, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn.
Ohio Assn. of Basketball Officials
International Assn. of Approved Bkb. Officials
Ohio High School Athletic Association
Toledo, Ohio
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 22, 2003, 02:12am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 9,466
Send a message via AIM to rainmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by coach/ref
...the girl was 6'1 53 pounds...
I hope this is an exaggeration, or a typo. I can't imagine a human being alive at this proportion, much less playing basketball.

Oh, I see. Did you mean six feet tall and one hundred and fifty three pounds? The space is in the wrong place?
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 22, 2003, 02:24am
We don't rent pigs
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,627
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Quote:
Originally posted by mick
Quote:
I wore knee pads only in the 7th grade. 1960. 43 years ago.

And I thought you were telling everybody that the girls loved your cute knees, why would you hide them behind knee pads.
Perhaps to protect them and keep them cute?
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum.
It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow.


Lonesome Dove
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 22, 2003, 03:11am
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Quote:
Originally posted by mick
I wore knee pads only in the 7th grade. 1960. 43 years ago.
[/B]
And I thought you were telling everybody that the girls loved your cute knees, why would you hide them behind knee pads.
[/B][/QUOTE]Mick was shy. After all, he was only 17 years old.

Sorry,mick. Debbil made me do it!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 22, 2003, 07:44am
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Houghton, U.P., Michigan
Posts: 9,953
Post Yabut

Quote:
Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Quote:
Originally posted by mick
I wore knee pads only in the 7th grade. 1960. 43 years ago.
And I thought you were telling everybody that the girls loved your cute knees, why would you hide them behind knee pads.
[/B]
Mick was shy. After all, he was only 17 years old.

[/B][/QUOTE]

...Regardless, I only wore them one year.
Very red. Went great with my orange and black uniform.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 22, 2003, 08:15am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Just north of hell
Posts: 9,250
Send a message via AIM to Dan_ref
Quote:
Originally posted by rainmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by coach/ref
...the girl was 6'1 53 pounds...
I hope this is an exaggeration, or a typo. I can't imagine a human being alive at this proportion, much less playing basketball.

Oh, I see. Did you mean six feet tall and one hundred and fifty three pounds? The space is in the wrong place?
6'1 53 lb female sounds like what some folks call "supermodel" these days.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 22, 2003, 11:48am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 9,466
Send a message via AIM to rainmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by Dan_ref
Quote:
Originally posted by rainmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by coach/ref
...the girl was 6'1 53 pounds...
I hope this is an exaggeration, or a typo. I can't imagine a human being alive at this proportion, much less playing basketball.

Oh, I see. Did you mean six feet tall and one hundred and fifty three pounds? The space is in the wrong place?
6'1 53 lb female sounds like what some folks call "supermodel" these days.
Dan -- I know you're just joking, and I'm not offended, but I really can't laugh. The ravages of the various "thin end" eating disorders are very difficult to overcome, and can be permanently damaging. It's only tragic and never to be taken lightly. Except for a very, very few very short women, the word "super" should never be applied to any adult weight under 100 pounds. It's just not healthy.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 22, 2003, 12:07pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Just north of hell
Posts: 9,250
Send a message via AIM to Dan_ref
Quote:
Originally posted by rainmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by Dan_ref
Quote:
Originally posted by rainmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by coach/ref
...the girl was 6'1 53 pounds...
I hope this is an exaggeration, or a typo. I can't imagine a human being alive at this proportion, much less playing basketball.

Oh, I see. Did you mean six feet tall and one hundred and fifty three pounds? The space is in the wrong place?
6'1 53 lb female sounds like what some folks call "supermodel" these days.
Dan -- I know you're just joking, and I'm not offended, but I really can't laugh. The ravages of the various "thin end" eating disorders are very difficult to overcome, and can be permanently damaging. It's only tragic and never to be taken lightly. Except for a very, very few very short women, the word "super" should never be applied to any adult weight under 100 pounds. It's just not healthy.
It was not meant as a joke, I agree it's a serious problem and what's being promoted as the "ideal" female body type these days borders on criminal.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 22, 2003, 04:08pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 9,466
Send a message via AIM to rainmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by Dan_ref
Quote:
Originally posted by rainmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by Dan_ref
Quote:
Originally posted by rainmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by coach/ref
...the girl was 6'1 53 pounds...
I hope this is an exaggeration, or a typo. I can't imagine a human being alive at this proportion, much less playing basketball.

Oh, I see. Did you mean six feet tall and one hundred and fifty three pounds? The space is in the wrong place?
6'1 53 lb female sounds like what some folks call "supermodel" these days.
Dan -- I know you're just joking, and I'm not offended, but I really can't laugh. The ravages of the various "thin end" eating disorders are very difficult to overcome, and can be permanently damaging. It's only tragic and never to be taken lightly. Except for a very, very few very short women, the word "super" should never be applied to any adult weight under 100 pounds. It's just not healthy.
It was not meant as a joke, I agree it's a serious problem and what's being promoted as the "ideal" female body type these days borders on criminal.

Hmmm....

That's twice in the last few days when I mis-interpreted a post of yours. I'm sorry. I'm not sure why it's happening, but I'll try to be a little less cynical in the future.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 22, 2003, 05:12pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Houghton, U.P., Michigan
Posts: 9,953
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by rainmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by Dan_ref


It was not meant as a joke, I agree it's a serious problem and what's being promoted as the "ideal" female body type these days borders on criminal.

Hmmm....

That's twice in the last few days when I mis-interpreted a post of yours. I'm sorry. I'm not sure why it's happening, but I'll try to be a little less cynical in the future.
Jewel,
Trust your partner.
mick
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 22, 2003, 05:43pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Just north of hell
Posts: 9,250
Send a message via AIM to Dan_ref
Quote:
Originally posted by rainmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by Dan_ref
Quote:
Originally posted by rainmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by Dan_ref
Quote:
Originally posted by rainmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by coach/ref
...the girl was 6'1 53 pounds...
I hope this is an exaggeration, or a typo. I can't imagine a human being alive at this proportion, much less playing basketball.

Oh, I see. Did you mean six feet tall and one hundred and fifty three pounds? The space is in the wrong place?
6'1 53 lb female sounds like what some folks call "supermodel" these days.
Dan -- I know you're just joking, and I'm not offended, but I really can't laugh. The ravages of the various "thin end" eating disorders are very difficult to overcome, and can be permanently damaging. It's only tragic and never to be taken lightly. Except for a very, very few very short women, the word "super" should never be applied to any adult weight under 100 pounds. It's just not healthy.
It was not meant as a joke, I agree it's a serious problem and what's being promoted as the "ideal" female body type these days borders on criminal.

Hmmm....

That's twice in the last few days when I mis-interpreted a post of yours. I'm sorry. I'm not sure why it's happening, but I'll try to be a little less cynical in the future.
Maybe we should avoid discussing God and supermodels?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:55pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1