View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 01, 2010, 11:02am
GoodwillRef GoodwillRef is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Racine, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by ajmc View Post
Given the propensity of coaches to hear what they want to hear, rather than what you might actually say, or mean, that sounds like an unnecessary comment that could really backfire. Unnecessary because the rule (NF: 9-4-5-a) spells exactly that out. The key word in this rule is unavoidable, which , unless you want to flirt with a can of worms. shouldn't need additional explanation, opinion or discussion.

The primary intent of this rule places total responsibility on the defense to AVOID contact with a kicker (or holder). 9-4-5-a is a purely judgment call and it's YOUR judgment alone that matters.
Understandable, but this rule was put in before the Rugby Punt was in vogue...not so much anymore in our parts. Every punt, kick, and pass white hats have to rule on what avoidable and unavoidable contact on punters, kickers, holders, and passers. We all have a slightly different opinion about how much contact and steps we are going to allow...and if it is roughing, running into, or nothing. I am not worried about the can of worms you speak of.
__________________
Every game is a big game
Reply With Quote